Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [   ] 

CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX:
Check the appropriate box:
[   ] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[   ]Confidential, forFor Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X]Definitive Proxy Statement
[   ] Definitive Additional Materials
[   ]Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12Under Rule 14a-12

ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX):
[X] No fee required.
[   ]Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5)Total fee paid:
[   ]Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.materials:
[   ]Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Formform or Scheduleschedule and the date of its filing.
1)Amount Previously Paid:
previously paid:
2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
3) Filing Party:
4) Date Filed:


Table of Contents








Notice of 2018
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
and Proxy Statement

May 23, 2018
9:00 a.m. (Eastern Time)
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NLY2018


Table of Contents

Dear Fellow Shareholders,

2017 was a year of realization for Annaly. We enter 2018 having made significant progress on a number of key goals and initiatives further strengthening Annaly’s market leadership.

SHAREHOLDER
ENGAGEMENT
Broad Outreach to Shareholders; Responsive Disclosure Enhancements
     Throughout the past year, we have continued to expand the shareholder outreach efforts undertaken since I became CEO in 2015. We’ve redoubled our efforts to engage in meaningful dialogue around critical strategic and governance issues with our shareholders. In 2017, these efforts spanned new and existing investors in the U.S., Canada and Europe and included our inaugural investor day with over 100 participants in attendance. Across our ownership base, we engaged with shareholders representing over 70% of the Company’s institutional ownership. We concluded 2017 with over 170 new institutional investors and our overall institutional shareholder base has increased over 30% since 2014(1). In response to shareholder feedback, and in line with the Company’s ongoing commitment to improved transparency, we’ve added enhanced disclosure to this proxy statement regarding the operating efficiencies of our diversified model, the parameters and makeup of our manager’s executive pay program and our enhanced corporate governance practices. We look forward to your feedback.
   
HUMAN CAPITAL &
OWNERSHIP CULTURE
Investing in Intellectual Capital with 125+ New Hires since 2014; 100% of Employees Subject to Stock Ownership Guidelines Have Purchased Annaly Shares
     3)Filing Party:Since the initiation of our diversification strategy in 2014, we have hired over 125 professionals including senior members of our diversified investment and management teams. Many of these professionals – and over 40% of the entire firm – have been asked to purchase predetermined amounts of shares based on criteria including seniority, compensation level and role. I’m pleased that as of March 31, 2018, all individuals either met, or within the applicable period are expected to meet, the stock ownership guidelines. Recently, I voluntarily increased my ownership commitment to $15 million of Annaly shares to further instill an ownership culture at the Firm and to emphasize my belief in the Company and its future.
   
OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE
48% More Efficient as a Percentage of Equity; 61% More Efficient than Peers as a Percentage of Assets(2)
While we have made broad and significant investments over the past few years in our investment platforms and financing strategies, we have not asked shareholders to bear the incremental costs for this growth and diversification. We currently operate our multi-strategy model with four distinct investment groups on a highly efficient basis, and our outsized returns are in part attributable to our diversified, scalable model, with an operating expense to equity ratio of 1.68%, 48% lower than the average of our industry peers. As a percentage of assets, this ratio is merely 0.25%, or 61% lower than the average mREIT.



(1)

Shareholder data per Ipreo based on investor filings as of December 31, 2017.

(2)

Represents Annaly’s average operating expense as a percentage of average assets and average equity compared to the Bloomberg mREIT Index (BBREMTG Index) for the year ended December 31, 2017. Analysis includes companies in BBREMTG Index as of December 31, 2017. Operating expense is defined as: (i) for internally-managed peers, the sum of compensation and benefits, general and administrative expenses (“G&A”) and other operating expenses, and (ii) for externally-managed peers and Annaly, the sum of net management fees, compensation and benefits (if any), G&A and other operating expenses.


Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement3


Table of Contents

DURABLE RETURNS
32% TSR, Outperforming Both the S&P 500 and Bloomberg mREIT Index by Nearly 50%(3)
We believe our diversified and scalable model is the predominant reason for our consistent, attractive returns and ability to capitalize on the numerous opportunities we have anticipated. In 2017, we produced a total shareholder return (TSR) of 32%, outperforming both the S&P 500 and the mREIT sector average by nearly 50%. 2017 was the best annual TSR for Annaly in the last decade – a tremendous accomplishment given the rising interest rate environment. Further, since 2014 when we began our diversification strategy, our TSR of 86% far exceeds the 57% return of the S&P 500. In March of 2018, we declared our 18th consecutive quarterly dividend of $0.30.
  
GOVERNANCE & SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Increased Percentage of Women on the Board to 36%; Execution of Long-Term ESG Strategy(4)
     4)Finally, well before ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) became the popular acronym it is today, we were already highly focused on all aspects of corporate governance. We are very proud of the addition of two new highly qualified directors, Vicki Williams and Katie Beirne Fallon, which brings the percentage of women on the Board to 36%. As another illustration of our commitment to a gender equal workplace, in early 2018, Annaly was named as one of only 103 companies to the Bloomberg Gender Equality Index. The Company has also turned its lens on governance inward, refreshing Committee memberships and Chairmanships, and creating a new Public Responsibility Committee to oversee socially dedicated initiatives - including our joint venture with Capital Impact Partners to support community development for underserved areas. While too many other companies have ignored or are forced to play “catch-up” in these critical areas, Annaly has demonstrated our full commitment to being a market leader in corporate governance.

After 20 years as a publicly-traded company, we have proven our longevity and delivered consistent outperformance while transforming Annaly into an industry leading, diversified “Yield Manufacturer”. Our continuous reflection of the past, self-assessment of the present and strategic planning for the future enables us to be opportunistic rather than reactive. It is humbling to remember where Annaly began and to celebrate the ingenuity and dedication it has taken to get Annaly where it is today. Our performance is attributable to our proprietary model and exceptional people. Each business and every strategic move is the product of our long developed plan. Our architecture is designed to capitalize on the numerous opportunities we are uniquely positioned to realize in the years ahead.

I thank our investors for their support and trust, our Board for its guidance and each one of our employees for their deep commitment to Annaly and its shareholders.

Finally, this year we are excited to hold our Annual Shareholder Meeting online for the first time via live webcast. The more interactive online format also enables us to open our Annual Meeting to shareholders from locations around the world. We look forward to speaking to you then.

Sincerely,

Kevin Keyes
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer & President
April 10, 2018

(3)Date Filed:

Represents total shareholder return (“TSR”) for the year ended December 31, 2017.

(4)

Board composition as of January 1, 2018.


4Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement                        



Table of Contents

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To be Held May 21, 2015


To the Stockholders of Annaly Capital Management, Inc.:

WeAnnaly Capital Management, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Annaly” or the “Company”), will hold theits annual meeting of the stockholders of Annaly(the “Annual Meeting”) on May 21, 2015,23, 2018, at 9:00 a.m., New York time, (Eastern Time) online at the Warwick Hotel, 65 West 54th Street, New York, New York 10019, to consider and vote on the following proposals:www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NLY2018, to:

1.election

Elect three Directors for terms of three Directorsyears each, one Director for a term of threetwo years each;and one Director for a term of one year as set forth in the accompanying Proxy Statement;

2.approval of a non-binding

Approve, on an advisory resolution on ourbasis, the Company’s executive compensation; and

3.ratification of

Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as ourthe Company’s independent registeredpublic accounting firm for 2015; and2018.

any other matters as may properly come before our annual meeting or any adjournmentor postponement thereof.

The Company will also transact any other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. Only our common stockholders of record at the close of business on March 27, 2015,26, 2018, the record date for the annual meeting,Annual Meeting, may vote at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting and any postponements or adjournments or postponements of it. A complete list of our common stockholders of record entitled to vote at the annual meeting will be available for inspection during the 10 business days before the annual meeting at our executive offices during ordinary business hours for proper purposes.thereof.

Your vote is very important. Please exercise your right to vote.

The Company’s Board of Directors (“Board”) is soliciting proxies in connection with the Annual Meeting. The Company is sending the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”), or a printed copy of the proxy materials, as applicable, commencing on or about April 10, 2018.

To view the Proxy Statement and other materials about the Annual Meeting, go to www.annalyannualmeeting.com or www.proxyvote.com.

All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting, which will be conducted via a live webcast. The Company is excited to embrace the environmentally-friendly virtual meeting format, which it believes will enable increased stockholder attendance and participation. During this virtual meeting, you may ask questions and will be able to vote your shares electronically. You may also submit questions in advance of the Annual Meeting by visiting www.proxyvote.com. The Company will respond to as many inquiries at the Annual Meeting as time allows.

An audio broadcast of the Annual Meeting will also be available to stockholders by telephone toll-free at 1-877-328-2502. If you plan to attend the annual meeting in person,Annual Meeting online or listen to the telephonic audio broadcast, you will need to presentthe 16-digit control number included in your admission ticket, or an account statement showing your ownership of our common stock as of the record date, and valid government issued photo identification. The indicated portion ofNotice, on your proxy card or voter instruction cardon the instructions that accompany your proxy materials. Please note that listening to the audio broadcast will serve as your admission ticket.not be deemed to be attending the Annual Meeting, and you cannot vote from such audio broadcast. The Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 9:00 a.m. (Eastern Time). Online check-in will begin at 8:30 a.m. (Eastern Time), and you should allow ample time for the online check-in procedures.

OurIf you wish to watch the webcast at a location provided by the Company, the Company’s Maryland counsel, Venable LLP, will air the webcast at its offices located at 750 E. Pratt Street, Suite 900, Baltimore, MD 21202. Please note that no members of management or the Board of Directors recommends thatwill be in attendance at this location. If you vote:would like to view the Annual Meeting webcast at Venable LLP’s office, please follow the directions for doing so set forth in the “Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting” section in this Proxy Statement.

“FOR” the election of each of the nominees as Directors;
“FOR” approval of the non-binding advisory resolution on executive compensation; and
“FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independentregistered public accounting firm for 2015.

By Order of the Board of Directors,


R. Nicholas Singh
Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
April 9, 201510, 2018

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be Held on May 23, 2018.
The Company’s Proxy Statement and 2017 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com.

Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement5


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

This summary contains highlights about the AvailabilityCompany and the Annual Meeting. This summary does not contain all of Proxy Materials
for the Stockholderinformation that you should consider in advance of the Annual Meeting, May 21, 2015.
Ourand the Company encourages you to read the entire Proxy Statement and 2014the Company’s 2017 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com.




Table of Contentson Form 10-K carefully before voting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS1
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION5
PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS6TIME
AND DATE:
Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. (Eastern Time)
Class I Directors7
Class II Directors8PLACE:www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NLY2018
Class III Directors9
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE, BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES10RECORD DATE:Close of business on March 26, 2018
Corporate Governance10
VOTING:Stockholders are able to vote by Internet at www.proxyvote.com; telephone at 1-800-690-6903; by completing and returning their proxy card; or online at the Annual Meeting

VOTING MATTERS

Board Oversight of RiskVote
Recommendation
10Page
Number
IndependenceProposal No. 1:Election of Our Directors10
Board Leadership StructureFOR each Director
nominee
11
Lead Independent Director11
Board Committees, Charters and Policies11
MANAGEMENT15
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT16
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND COMPENSATION17
Named Executive Officers17
Compensation Discussion and Analysis17
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION19
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORSProposal No. 2:Approval, on an advisory basis, of the Company’s executive compensationFOR2045
Director CompensationProposal No. 3:21
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION21
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS22
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE24
PROPOSAL 2 APPROVAL OF A NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE
APPROVING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION25
PROPOSAL 3 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM26
Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm26
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE27
ACCESS TO FORM 10-K27
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS27
OTHER MATTERS27



Table of Contents

ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.
1211 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10036
______________________

2015 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
______________________

PROXY STATEMENT

Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (“Annaly”, “we”, “our” or “us”) is furnishing this proxy statement in connection with our solicitation of proxies to be voted at our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders. We will hold the annual meeting at the Warwick Hotel, 65 West 54th Street, New York, New York 10019, on Thursday, May 21, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. New York time, and any postponements or adjournments thereof. We are sending this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy to our stockholders commencing on or about April 10, 2015.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING

Q:What am I voting on?
A:(1)Election of three Directors, Wellington J. Denahan, Michael Haylon and Donnell A. Segalas, for terms of three years;
(2)Approval of a non-binding advisory resolution on our executive compensation; and
(3)Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLPFOR49

PARTICIPATE IN THE ANNUAL MEETING

After years of declining attendance by stockholders at Annaly’s in-person annual meetings, the Company is moving to an online format for this year’s Annual Meeting. By hosting the Annual Meeting virtually, Annaly is able to communicate more effectively with its stockholders, enable increased attendance and participation from locations around the world and reduce costs for both the Company and its stockholders. This approach also aligns with the Company’s broader sustainability goals. The virtual meeting has been designed to provide the same rights to participate as you would have at an in-person meeting, including providing opportunities to make statements and ask questions.

VOTING

Stockholders are entitled
to vote by

INTERNET
www.proxyvote.com

TELEPHONE
1-800-690-6903

MAIL
completing and returning
their proxy card

ONLINE
at the Annual Meeting

INFORMATION
www.annalyannualmeeting.com


You are entitled to participate and vote at the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NLY2018. An audio broadcast of the Annual Meeting will also be available to stockholders by telephone toll-free at 1-877-328-2502. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting online or listen to the telephonic audio broadcast, you will need the 16-digit control number included in your Notice, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompany your proxy materials. Please note that listening to the audio broadcast will not be deemed to be attending the Annual Meeting and you cannot vote from such audio broadcast. Stockholders can access Annaly’s interactive pre-meeting forum, where you can submit questions in advance of the Annual Meeting and view copies of the Company’s proxy materials, by visiting www.proxyvote.com.

If you wish to watch the webcast at a location provided by the Company, the Company’s Maryland counsel, Venable LLP, will air the webcast at its offices located at 750 E. Pratt Street, Suite 900, Baltimore, MD 2102. Please note that no members of management or the Board will be in attendance at this location. If you wish to view the Annual Meeting via webcast at Venable LLP’s office, please complete theReservation Request Form found at the end of this Proxy Statement. For additional information on the Annual Meeting, and for copies of the Company’s Proxy Statement and 2017 Annual Report, please visit Annaly’s Annual Meeting informational website at www.annalyannualmeeting.com.

6Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

ANNALY AT A GLANCE

NLY
New York Stock
Exchange Traded

1997
Initial Public Offering

$15 billion(1)
Largest mortgage REIT
in the world

The Company has been externally-managed by Annaly Management Company LLC (the “Manager”) since July 2013. The Manager is responsible for managing the Company’s affairs pursuant to a management agreement. The Manager pays all of the compensation, including benefits, to its employees (which include the named executive officers (“NEOs”) other than Mr. Keyes, who receives no compensation for his services as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), but has an interest in the management fee as an indirect equityholder of the Manager). Although certain personnel (but none of the NEOs) are employed by subsidiaries of the Company for regulatory or corporate efficiency reasons, all compensation and benefits paid to such personnel by these subsidiaries reduce, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, the management fee the Company pays to the Manager. As of December 31, 2017, the Manager had 146 employees and Annaly’s subsidiaries collectively had six employees. For ease of reference, throughout this Proxy Statement, the NEOs and the other employees of the Manager, together with employees of Annaly’s subsidiaries, are sometimes referred to as Annaly’s employees.

RECENT OPERATING ACHIEVEMENTS
PerformanceCapital RaisingDividends

32%
Total Shareholder Return in
2017, the single best year in
the last decade

$2.8 billion
of capital raised across
common and preferred
markets over 6 months(2)

$1.4 billion
Common and preferred
dividends declared in 2017; Q1
represents the 18thconsecutive
quarter of a $0.30 dividend(3)

DiversificationOptionalityEfficiency

24%
Capital dedicated to credit
assets at the end of 2017, an
increase from 11% in 2014

36
Available investment options
is nearly 3x more than in 2013

48%
Lower operating expense as our independent registered public accounting firma
percentage of equity than the
mREIT index in 2017(4)

AlignmentFinancingHuman Capital

$5.9 million
of common stock purchased
by Annaly’s NEOs in 2017(5),
with the CEO voluntarily
increasing his stock ownership
commitment to $15 million

7
New financing relationships as
part of initiative to broaden and
diversify counterparties

27
New hires in 2017, bringing
total new hires since 2014
to 125+, including several
members of management

(1)

Represents capital as of December 31, 2017.

(2)

Capital raising total proceeds include $425 million preferred offering completed in January 2018. Gross proceeds are before deducting underwriting discounts and other offering expenses.

(3)

The first quarter 2018 common stock cash dividend was declared on March 15, 2018 and is payable on April 30, 2018.

(4)

Represents the percentage difference of Annaly’s operating expense as a percentage of average equity vs. the BBREMTG for 2015.2017. Operating expense is defined as: (i) for internally-managed BBREMTG members, the sum of compensation & benefits, general & administrative expenses and other operating expenses, and (ii) for externally-managed BBREMTG members, the sum of net management fees, compensation & benefits (if any), general & administrative expenses and other operating expenses.

(5)

Includes dividend reinvestments.


Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement7


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

ANNALY’S DIVERSIFIED INVESTMENT STRATEGY

Diversification is a key component of the Annaly strategy. Since 2014, Annaly has diversified its business model by investing in credit assets, which complement the Company’s primary portfolio of interest rate sensitive investments. This strategy is designed to achieve stable risk-adjusted earnings and book value performance over various interest rate and economic cycles by pairing shorter duration floating-rate credit securities with the Company’s longer duration, fixed-rate agency portfolio. Annaly now has four distinct investment groups, which provide access to over 36 investment options and structures. While managing investment decisions, the Company combines a robust capital allocation process with careful risk management. This process enables Annaly to take advantage of market fluctuations and inefficiencies and rotate into credit markets when dislocations occur and pricing is attractive on a risk-adjusted, relative value basis.

AgencyResidential CreditCommercial Real EstateMiddle Market Lending
Invests in agency
MBS collateralized by
residential mortgages,
which are guaranteed by
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac
or Ginnie Mae
Invests in non-agency
residential mortgage
assets within securitized
product and whole
loan markets
Originates and invests
in commercial mortgage
loans, securities, and
other commercial real
estate debt and equity
investments
Provides financing to
private equity backed
middle market
businesses across
the capital structure
Q:How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote on these proposals?
A:Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote:
(1)“FOR” the election of each of the nominees as Directors;
Assets1
(2)“FOR” approval of the non-binding advisory resolution on executive compensation; and
Capital2
(3)“FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2015.
Q:Who is entitled to vote at the meeting?
A:Only common stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 27, 2015, the record date, are entitled to vote at the meeting.



Table of Contents

Q:What quorum is required for the meeting?
A:A quorum will be present at the annual meeting if a majority of the votes entitled to be cast are present, in person or by proxy. Since there were 947,698,431 outstanding shares of common stock, each entitled to one vote per share, as of the record date, we will need at least 473,849,216 votes present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting for a quorum to exist. If a quorum is not present at the annual meeting, we expect that the annual meeting will be adjourned to solicit additional proxies.
Q:What are the voting requirements that apply to the proposals discussed in this proxy statement?
A:
  VoteDiscretionary Voting
ProposalRequiredAllowed?
(1)     Election of Directors Majority No
(2)     Advisory vote on our executive compensationMajorityNo
(3)     Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLPMajorityYes
“Majority” means (a) with regard to the election of Directors, the affirmative vote of a majority of all the votes cast on the election of a Director on a per Director basis; provided, however, that in an election of Directors, if the number of nominees exceeds the number of Directors to be elected at such meeting, the Directors shall be elected by the vote of a plurality of the shares represented in person or by proxy at any such meeting; and (b) with regard to the advisory vote on our executive compensation and the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, a majority of the votes cast at the annual meeting.
“Discretionary voting” occurs when a bank, broker, or other holder of record does not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner and votes those shares in its discretion on any proposal as to which the rules of the New York Stock Exchange permit such bank, broker, or other holder of record to vote. When banks, brokers, and other holders of record are not permitted under the New York Stock Exchange rules to vote the beneficial owner’s shares on a proposal, and there is at least one other proposal on which discretionary voting is allowed, the affected shares are referred to as broker “non-votes.”

Q:What is the effect of abstentions and broker “non-votes”?
A:Abstentions will be treated as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. An abstention is the voluntary act of not voting by a stockholder who is present at a meeting and entitled to vote. Broker “non-votes” will be treated as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum at the annual meeting.
Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will have no effect on the election of the Directors (Proposal No. 1), the advisory vote on our executive compensation (Proposal No. 2) and the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP (Proposal No. 3).


Table of Contents

Q:How will my shares be voted if I do not specify how they should be voted?
A:Properly executed proxies that do not contain voting instructions will be voted as follows:
  
$107.3bn | $11.6bn(1)$2.8bn | $1.6bnProposal No. 1: FOR the election of Directors;    $2.0bn | $1.1bn$1.0bn | $0.8bn
Sector Rank3
#1/6(2)#6/18Proposal No. 2: FOR the advisory vote on our executive compensation; and#4/12#14/42
Strategy
Countercyclical/
Defensive
(3)Cyclical/GrowthProposal No. 3: FOR the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.
Cyclical/Growth
The individuals named as proxies by a stockholder may vote for one or more adjournments of the annual meeting, including adjournments to permit further solicitations of proxies.
We do not expect that any matter other than the proposals described above will be brought before the annual meeting. If, however, other matters are properly presented at the annual meeting, the individuals named as proxies will vote in accordance with the recommendation of our Board of Directors.
Q:What do I do if I want to change my vote?
A:You may revoke a proxy at any time before it is voted by filing with us a duly executed revocation of proxy, by submitting a duly executed proxy to us with a later date or by appearing at the annual meeting and voting in person. You may revoke a proxy by any of these methods, regardless of the method used to deliver your previous proxy. Attendance at the annual meeting without voting will not itself revoke a proxy.
Q:How will voting on any other business be conducted?
A:Other than the three proposals described in this proxy statement, we know of no other business to be considered at the annual meeting. If any other matters are properly presented at the meeting, your signed proxy card authorizes Wellington J. Denahan, our Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, and R. Nicholas Singh, our Secretary, to vote on those matters according to their best judgment.
Q:Who will count the vote?
A:Representatives of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., the independent Inspector of Elections, will count the votes.
Q:Who can attend the annual meeting?
A:All stockholders of record as of March 27, 2015 can attend the annual meeting, although seating is limited. If your shares are held through a broker and you would like to attend, please either (1) write us at Investor Relations, Annaly Capital Management, Inc., 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036 or email us at investor@annaly.com, or (2) bring to the meeting a copy of your brokerage account statement or an omnibus proxy (which you can get from your broker).
In addition, you must bring valid, government issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license or a passport. If you plan to attend, please check the box on your proxy card and return it as directed on the proxy card. In addition, if you are a record holder of common stock, your name is subject to verification against the list of our record holders on the record date prior to being admitted to the annual meeting. If you are not a record holder but hold shares in street name, that is, with a broker, dealer, bank or other financial institution that serves as your nominee, you should be prepared to provide proof of beneficial ownership on the record date, or similar evidence of ownership. If you do not provide valid government issued photo identification or


Table of Contents

comply with the other procedures outlined above upon request, you will not be admitted to the annual meeting.
Security measures will be in place at the meeting to help ensure the safety of attendees. Metal detectors similar to those used in airports may be located at the entrance to the auditorium and briefcases, handbags and packages may be inspected. No cameras or recording devices of any kind, or signs, placards, banners or similar materials, may be brought into the meeting. Anyone who refuses to comply with these requirements will not be admitted.
Q:How will we solicit proxies for the annual meeting?
A:We are soliciting proxies by mailing this proxy statement and proxy card to our stockholders. We will pay the expenses incurred in connection with the printing and mailing of this proxy statement. In addition to solicitation by mail, our Directors and officers and employees of our subsidiaries and Annaly Management Company LLC (our “Manager”), who will not be specially compensated, may solicit proxies from our stockholders by telephone, facsimile or other electronic means or in person. Arrangements also will be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for the forwarding of solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of shares held of record by these persons, and we will reimburse them for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. We will bear the total cost of soliciting proxies.
We have retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated, a proxy solicitation firm, to assist us in the solicitation of proxies in connection with the annual meeting. We will pay Innisfree a fee of $15,000 for its services. In addition, we may pay Innisfree additional fees depending on the extent of additional services requested by us and will reimburse Innisfree for expenses Innisfree incurs in connection with its engagement by us. In addition to the fees paid to Innisfree, we will pay all other costs of soliciting proxies.
Stockholders have the option to vote over the internet or by telephone. Please be aware that if you vote over the internet, you may incur costs such as telephone and access charges for which you will be responsible.
Q:What is “Householding” and does Annaly do this?
A:Householding is a procedure approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under which stockholders who have the same address and last name and do not participate in electronic delivery of proxy materials receive only one copy of a company’s proxy statement and annual report from a company, bank, broker or other intermediary, unless one or more of these stockholders notifies the company, bank, broker or other intermediary that they wish to continue to receive individual copies. We engage in this practice, which is known as “householding,” as it reduces our printing and postage costs. However, if a stockholder of record residing at such an address wishes to receive a separate annual report or proxy statement, he or she may request it orally or in writing by contacting us at Annaly Capital Management, Inc., 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036, Attention: Investor Relations, by emailing us atinvestor@annaly.com, or by calling us at 212-696-0100, and we will promptly deliver to the stockholder the requested annual report or proxy statement. If a stockholder of record residing at such an address wishes to receive a separate annual report or proxy statement in the future, he or she may contact us in the same manner. If you are an eligible stockholder of record receiving multiple copies of our annual report and proxy statement, you can request householding by contacting us in the same manner. If you own your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee, you can request householding by contacting the nominee.


Table of Contents

Q:Could the Annual Meeting be postponed or adjourned?
A:If a quorum is not present or represented, our bylaws permit the chairman of the meeting to postpone or adjourn the meeting, without notice other than an announcement.
Q:Who can help answer my questions?
A:If you have any questions or need assistance voting your shares or if you need additional copies of this proxy statement or the enclosed proxy card, you should contact:

Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Phone: (212) 696-0100
Facsimile: (212) 696-9809
Email: investor@annaly.com
Attention: Investor Relations

Our principal executive offices are located at 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any reports, statements or other information that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room at Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.

Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the Public Reference Room. These SEC filings are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and at the Internet worldwide web site maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. Reports, proxy statements and other information concerning us may also be inspected at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, which is located at 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.

Our website is www.annaly.com. We make available on this website under “Investor Relations - SEC Filings,” free of charge, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such materials to the SEC.



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

At the annual meeting, the stockholders will vote to elect three Class I Directors, whose terms will expire at our annual meeting of stockholders in 2018, subject to the election and qualification of their successors or to their earlier death, resignation or removal.

We have three Classes of Directors. Our Class I Directors elected at this year’s meeting will serve until our annual meeting of stockholders in 2018. Our Class II Directors serve until our annual meeting of stockholders in 2016. Our Class III Directors serve until our annual meeting of stockholders in 2017. Set forth below are the names and certain biographical information on each of our Directors.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR WELLINGTON J. DENAHAN, MICHAEL HAYLON AND DONNELL A. SEGALAS AS DIRECTORS TO HOLD OFFICE UNTIL OUR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS IN 2018 AND UNTIL THEIR RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS ARE DULY ELECTED AND QUALIFIED. THE PERSONS NAMED IN THE ENCLOSED PROXY WILL VOTE YOUR PROXY IN FAVOR OF THESE NOMINEES UNLESS YOU SPECIFY A CONTRARY CHOICE IN YOUR PROXY.

NameClassCountercyclical/
Defensive
AgeIndependentDirector SinceCommittee Memberships
Wellington J. DenahanI51NoJanuary 1997None
Michael HaylonI57YesJune 2008Audit
RiskLevered Returns4
9%-10%8%-11%7%-10%9%-11%
(1)

Agency assets include to be announced (“TBA”) purchase contracts (market value) and mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”). Residential Credit and Annaly Commercial Real Estate (“ACREG”) assets include only the economic interest of consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”).

(2)

Dedicated capital includes TBA purchase contracts, excludes non-portfolio related activity and varies from total stockholders’ equity.

(3)

Sector rank compares Annaly dedicated capital in each of its four investment groups as of December 31, 2017 (adjusted for price to book as of December 31, 2017) to the market capitalization of the companies in each respective comparative sector as of December 31, 2017. Comparative sectors used for Agency, Residential Credit and Commercial Real Estate ranking are their respective sector within the BBREMTG as of December 31, 2017. Comparative sector used for Middle Market Lending ranking is the S&P BDC Index.

(4)

Levered return assumptions are for illustrative purposes only and attempt to represent current market asset returns and financing terms for prospective investments of the same, or a substantially similar, nature in each respective group.


8Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

The Company has 36 investment options across its four investment groups, which is nearly three times more than in 2013 and up from 26 options at the end of 2015.

Number of Available Investment Options

DIVIDENDS

From Annaly’s IPO in 1997 through December 31, 2017, the Company has declared over $16 billion in common and preferred dividends to its stockholders. In 2017, Annaly declared over $1.4 billion in common and preferred dividends.

$16 billion
The cumulative dividends
Annaly has delivered to
stockholders since its IPO

$1.4 billion
of common and preferred
dividends delivered to
stockholders in 2017

18
Consecutive quarters of a $0.30
dividend through Q1 2018


Cumulative Dividends Declared since Annaly’s IPO

Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement9


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

DELIVERING SIGNIFICANT VALUE FOR STOCKHOLDERS

12.4%(1)
Economic return in 2017, which represents the change in book value plus dividends declared over the year
32%
Total shareholder return in 2017, the single best year in the last decade
883%
Total shareholder return since Annaly’s IPO (including reinvestment of dividends)

Since 2014 (the first full year the Company was externally-managed, as more fully described in “Management Structure” on page38), Annaly has performed well against relevant benchmarks. As illustrated by the graphs below, shares of the Company’s common stock (including reinvestment of dividends) have returned significant value to stockholders over the long term relative to both the Company’s mREIT peers and other yield-focused investments.

Total Shareholder Return since 2014(2)

2017 Total Shareholder Return(2)
(1)

Economic return is shown for full year 2017 and represents change in book value plus dividends declared over prior period book value.

(2)

Source: Bloomberg. mREITs represent BBREMTG Index. Utilities represent the Russell 3000 Utilities Index. MLPs represent the Alerian MLP Index. Asset Managers represent the S&P 500 Asset Management and Custody Bank Index. Banks represent the KBW Bank Index. S&P represents the S&P 500 index. Note: Total shareholder return shown for period of December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2017 in top graph. Total shareholder return shown for period of December 31, 2016 to December 31, 2017 in bottom graph.


10Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

STOCKHOLDER OUTREACH AND RESULTS OF 2017 SAY-ON-PAY VOTE

7
Non-deal roadshows across the U.S., Canada and Europe
72
One-on-one meetings and phone calls with stockholders
100+
Participants attended Annaly’s inaugural Investor Day

The Company is committed to ongoing engagement with both retail and institutional stockholders through a wide range of mediums. These engagement efforts have yielded meaningful feedback on a variety of topics, including the Company’s diversified investment strategy and its corporate governance, compensation and management structures.

Following the results of Annaly’s 2017 advisory resolution on executive compensation (commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” vote), which received support from 69% of votes cast, the Company continued its multi-pronged outreach campaign to solicit feedback from key stakeholders on a number of issues, including the Manager’s executive compensation program and proposed compensation disclosure for 2018, board composition and refreshment and corporate social responsibility initiatives.

Stockholder Engagement Efforts in 2017
Outreach included
approximately
Outreach included
approximately
Management hosted meetings
with investors representing

The Company’s stockholder outreach efforts to solicit feedback on the Manager’s executive compensation program and the Company’s proposed disclosure were complemented by related initiatives, including:

Analysis of market practices at peer companies

Advice from compensation consultants

Attendance at investor conferences

Discussions with proxy advisory services and corporate governance research firms

These stockholder engagement efforts generated significant feedback for both the Board and management and resulted in a number of enhancements to corporate governance and compensation practices and disclosures. Annaly’s stockholders have been extremely instrumental to, and supportive of, these governance and disclosure enhancements and the Company looks forward to continuing to find innovative ways to engage over the course of 2018 and beyond.

Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement11


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

WHAT THE
COMPANY HEARD

WHAT THE COMPANY DID

Improve Disclosure to
Enable Fully Informed
Say-on-Pay Vote
Provided additional clarity and transparency on the Manager’s executive compensation program, including disclosure of:
the portion of the management fee that is allocated to NEO compensation paid by the Manager
of this compensation, the portion of fixed vs. variable/incentive pay
the metrics utilized to measure performance to determine variable/ incentive pay
Further Increase
Alignment of Senior
Executives with
Stockholders
CEO voluntarily increased his stock ownership commitment to $15 million (from his existing requirement of $10 million) and pledged to meet this amount through open market purchases within three years
Other members of senior management, including the Chief Investment Officer, Chief Credit Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Legal Officer, also committed to voluntarily increase their stock ownership positions beyond the amounts required under their applicable stock ownership guidelines
Focus on Board
Refreshment and
Diversity
Adopted an enhanced Board self-evaluation process that includes annual assessments of the full Board, each Board committee and individual Directors, which will be facilitated by an external evaluator on a periodic basis
Assessed all Directors to ensure continued match of skills against the Company’s needs
Refreshed Board Committee memberships and chairmanships
Appointed 2 new highly qualified Directors to the Board as of January 1, 2018
Doubled the number of women Directors (from 2 to 4) as a result of these appointments
36% of Directors are women
4 of 11 Directors have tenure of less than 5 years
Elevate Board Education
Board became a Full Board Member of the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD), which gives Directors access to an extensive menu of board education programs, along with research on governance trends and board practices
Expand Corporate
Social Responsibility
Created Public Responsibility Committee of the Board to provide oversight of corporate philanthropy, culture and reputation, social impact investments and initiatives related to sustainability and public policy
The Company partnered with Capital Impact Partners to launch a new joint venture dedicated to supporting community development in underserved cities across the country
Recognized in the 2018 Bloomberg Gender-Equality Index, reflecting the Company’s commitment to creating a gender equal workplace
Increase Opportunities for
Stockholder Engagement
Hosted first investor day with over 100 attendees
Moving to an online format for the Annual Meeting to enable increased stockholder attendance and participation
Established interactive pre-meeting forum, where stockholders can submit questions in advance of the Annual Meeting

12Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

ENHANCED DISCLOSURE ON THE MANAGER’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

89.7%
of NEO compensation was variable and paid in the form of performance-based cash incentive bonuses
10.3%
of NEO compensation was paid in the form of fixed base salaries
16.2%
of the aggregate management fees paid to the Manager were allocated by the Manager as NEO compensation

Over the last two years, the Company has engaged in extensive outreach to understand the information stockholders need in order to fully evaluate the Manager’s executive compensation program for purposes of making an informed Say-on-Pay vote. In response to this feedback, the Manager has provided the information below about the compensation it paid to the NEOs for 2017.

With the exception of Mr. Keyes (who does not receive any direct or indirect compensation from the Manager or the Company for his services as the Company’s CEO, but does have an interest in the fees paid to the Manager as an indirect equityholder of the Manager), each of the NEOs received a base salary and a performance-based cash incentive bonus for 2017.

During 2017, the NEOs as a group received aggregate salaries of $2.8 million and aggregate performance-based cash incentive bonuses of $23.9 million from the Manager. These amounts collectively represent 16.2% of the aggregate management fees the Company paid to the Manager during 2017. On an aggregated basis, the NEOs received 10.3% of their total compensation in the form of base salaries and the remaining 89.7% in the form of performance-based cash incentive bonuses.

In determining the cash bonuses it paid to the NEOs for 2017, the Manager considered achievement of both rigorous Company performance metrics,(1)including core return on equity, core return on assets, and operating expenses as a percentage of average equity, along with individual performance objectives.

The Manager considered a list of specified peer companies (set forth on page44 under “Company Market Data”), together with advice from the Manager’s compensation consultants, to develop appropriate compensation packages for the NEOs.

For additional information about the Manager, the management agreement and executive compensation, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions,” “Management Structure”, “Compensation Paid by the Manager to the Named Executive Officers” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

(1)

Each of the core performance metrics referred to in this Proxy Statement, including core return on equity and core return on assets, excludes the premium amortization adjustment, which represents the cumulative impact on prior periods, but not the current period, of quarter-over-quarter changes in estimated long-term prepayment speeds related to the Company’s Agency mortgage-backed securities.


Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement13


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

THE MANAGER AND THE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT

1.05%
The Manager receives a fee equal to 1.05% of the Company’s stockholders’ equity
29%
Annaly’s management fee is 29% lower than the industry average of 1.48%(1)
$276 million
Approximate compensation savings since the Externalization in July 2013(2)

All of the NEOs are indirect owners and/or employees of the Manager

With the exception of Mr. Keyes, each of the other NEOs receives compensation paid by the Manager. Mr. Keyes receives no compensation for his services as CEO, although, as an indirect equityholder of the parent of the Manager, Mr. Keyes has an interest in the fees paid to the Manager

The Manager is responsible for the compensation of its employees (including the NEOs other than Mr. Keyes) who provide services to the Company. Annaly does not pay any cash or equity compensation to its executive officers, does not provide pension benefits, perquisites or other personal benefits, and has no employment agreements or arrangements to pay any cash severance upon their termination or a change in control of the Company

The Manager receives a flat management fee equal to 1.05% of the Company’s stockholders’ equity (as defined in the Management Agreement), which is used by the Manager to, among other things, pay the compensation and benefits of the Manager’s employees (including the NEOs). However, the Company does not determine the compensation payable by the Manager to the NEOs, the Company does not allocate any specific portion of the management fee it pays to the compensation of the NEOs, nor does the Company reimburse the Manager for the cost of such compensation

For 2017, the management fee was approximately $164.3 million

Over the past several years, the Manager has made significant investments in personnel corresponding to the diversification of its investment strategy into more people-intensive asset classes (including Residential Credit, Commercial Real Estate and Middle Market Lending assets), as well as to corporate infrastructure enhancements. These investments include the build out of teams for the Agency, Residential Credit, Commercial Real Estate and Middle Market Lending groups, and significant hires in business support functions, such as Risk Management, Legal and Compliance, Finance and Information Technology, among others.

Investment in Annaly’s People
 
91     96%
Dedicated staff supporting best-in-class Risk Management, Technology, Legal, Finance and Business Development functionsof employees feel Annaly is committed to exceeding stockholder expectations, compared to the Financial Services average of 88%(3)
 
107
Internal development programs in place with 100% employee participationManagement committees with broad representation designed to provide guidance and oversight

The costs of these personnel expansions and improvements have been paid by the Manager rather than by the Company. Unlike a number of other externally-managed REITs, Annaly does not reimburse the Manager for any portion or subset of employment costs, all of which are borne by the Manager. An increase to these costs does not result in any increase to the management fee, which is a fixed percentage of stockholders’ equity as described above.

Despite the costs associated with the diversification of its investment strategy, the Manager has continued to operate the business in an efficient manner with appropriately scaled operating costs (including the management fee). As illustrated by the table below, Annaly’s average operating expense levels have remained significantly lower than both its internally- and externally-managed mREIT peers over the last six years.

(1)

The “industry average” reflects the average management fee of all externally-managed companies (excluding Annaly) included in the BBREMTG Index as of December 31, 2017. For additional information, including assumptions, about this calculation, please see “Management Agreement Terms” on pages38 - 39.

(2)

For additional information, including assumptions, about this calculation, please see “Continued Cost Savings Related to the Externalization” onpage 40.

(3)

“Financial Services” average is provided by Perceptyx based on a cross section of global and domestic banks, credit card companies, insurance companies, accountancy companies, consumer finance companies, stock brokerages, and investment funds.


14Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

Operating Expense as a Percentage of Average Equity(1)

2012     2013     2014     2015     2016     2017     Average
1.45%1.66%1.61%1.58%1.65%1.68%1.61%
Internally-Managed
Peers
2.71%3.95%3.92%3.68%2.14%2.10%3.08%
Externally-Managed
Peers
2.38%3.06%3.55%3.82%4.36%4.00%3.53%
mREIT Index2.33%3.30%3.62%3.80%3.53%3.25%3.30%

For additional information about the Manager, the management agreement and executive compensation, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions,” “Management Structure”, “Compensation Paid by the Manager to the Named Executive Officers” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

GOVERNANCE TIMELINE

Annaly Strives for Best-in-Class Governance Practices

2013
Annaly’s proposal to be externally managed received 83% support from stockholders
Added new Independent Director
2014
Enhanced financial disclosure, including additional financial metrics
Added new Independent Director
2015
Robust Lead Independent Director role created
Established Risk Committee
Detailed succession planning process with Board
Kevin Keyes appointed as CEO
Initiated extensive investor outreach
2016
Adopted broad-based stock ownership guidelines for employees
Increased Board ownership guidelines
Adopted clawback policy for external manager
Adopted anti-pledging policy
Adopted four-year stock holding period
2017
Established a new Public Relations Committee; rotated Board Committee chairs and members
Launched social impact investing joint venture
Inclusion of Board skills matrix in proxy statement
Joined Council of Institutional Investors (CII) as corporate member
Designated second Audit Committee financial expert
Joined National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) as Full Board Member
NEOs voluntarily committed to increase stock ownership positions
Hosted inaugural Investor Day
Launched Women's Interactive Network
2018
Added 2 Independent Directors
Virtual meeting format for Annual Meeting
Adopted enhanced Board evaluation process, including individual directors assessments and periodic use of external facilitator
Enhanced compensation and other disclosure in proxy statement
Included in the 2018 Bloomberg Gender-Equality Index
(1)

Source: Company Filings, SNL and Bloomberg. Averages are market weighted based on market capitalization as of December 31st of each respective year. Note: Internally-Managed Peers and Externally-Managed Peers represent the respective internally- and externally-managed members of the BBREMTG Index as of December 31st of each respective year. The average for each excludes Annaly and companies during years in which they became public or first listed. Operating Expense is defined as: (i) for Internally-Managed Peers, the sum of compensation & benefits, general & administrative expenses and other operating expenses, and (ii) for Externally-Managed Peers and Annaly, the sum of net management fees, compensation & benefits (if any), general & administrative expenses and other operating expenses. Annaly’s 2016 operating expenses exclude costs of $49 million related to the Company’s acquisition of Hatteras Financial Corp.


Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement15


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

BOARD COMPOSITION AND REFRESHMENT

4
of 11 Directors have tenure of
less than 5 years
82%
of Annaly’s Board of
Directors is comprised of
Independent Directors with
deep and diverse expertise
36%
of Annaly’s Board of
Directors are women

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee (the “NCG Committee”) of the Board seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience and capability on the Board. Newer Directors offer fresh ideas and perspectives, while deeply experienced Directors bring extensive knowledge of the Company’s complex operations. On an annual basis, the NCG Committee evaluates the Board’s overall composition, including Director tenure and rigorously evaluates all Directors to ensure a continued match of their skill sets against the needs of the Company. This assessment also informs Board succession planning, and contributed to the appointment, effective January 1, 2018, of two new Independent Directors (Katie Beirne Fallon and Vicki Williams) with skills that complement the Company’s highly qualified Board. The table below summarizes key qualifications, skills, and attributes most relevant to the Directors’ service on the Board. For additional information about individual Director’s qualifications and experience, please see the Director biographies beginning on page20.

Board Skill / Experience Summary

16Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance at Annaly18
Proposal 1: Election of Directors19
Class I Directors20
Class II Directors21
Class III Directors23
Independence of Directors25
Director Nomination Process25
Director Criteria and Qualifications25
Board Refreshment and Diversity25
Stockholder Recommendation of Director Candidates26
The Board’s Role and Responsibilities26
Board Oversight of Risk27
Management Succession Planning27
Board Commitment and Over-Boarding Policy28
Communications with the Board28
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions28
Board Structure and Processes30
Board Leadership Structure30
Executive Sessions of Independent Directors30
Board and Committee Evaluations31
Director Orientation and Continuing Education31
Governing Documents31
Board Committees32
Director Attendance35
Compensation of Directors35
Management37
Stock Purchases by Executive Officers since 201137
Management Structure38
Overview38
Management Agreement Terms38
Structure and Amount of the Management Fee39
Continued Cost Savings Related to the Externalization40
Annual Review of Manager Performance and Management Fee Considerations40
Compensation Paid by the Manager to the Named Executive Officers42
Named Executive Officers42
Introduction42
Disclosure Enhancements42
Executive Compensation45
Proposal 2: Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation45
Compensation Discussion and Analysis45
Executive Compensation Policies47
Compensation Committee Report48
Executive Compensation Tables48
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation48
CEO Pay Ratio48
Audit Committee Matters49
Proposal 3: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm49
Report of the Audit Committee49
Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm50
Stock Ownership Information51
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management51
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance52
Other Information53
Access to Form 10-K53
Stockholder Proposals53
Other Matters53
Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting53
Where You Can Find More Information57

Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement17


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance at Annaly

(1)

Represents the percentage difference of operating expense as a percentage of average equity for Annaly vs. the BBREMTG average for 2017.

(2)

Represents the percentage difference of operating expense as a percentage of average assets for Annaly vs. the BBREMTG average for 2017. Notes: Operating Expense is defined as: (i) for internally-managed BBREMTG members, the sum of compensation & benefits, general & administrative expenses and other operating expenses, and (ii) for externally-managed BBREMTG members (including Annaly), the sum of net management fees, compensation & benefits (if any), general & administrative expenses and other operating expenses.


18Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance at Annaly

PROPOSAL
01
Election of Directors

The Company has three classes of Directors. At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will vote to elect three Class I Directors (Wellington J. Denahan, Michael Haylon and Donnell A. Segalas), whose terms will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders in 2021 (“2021 Annual Meeting”), one Class III Director (Katie Beirne Fallon, who was appointed to the Board, effective January 1, 2018), whose term will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders in 2020 (“2020 Annual Meeting”), and one Class II Director (Vicki Williams, who was appointed to the Board, effective January 1, 2018), whose term will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders in 2019 (“2019 Annual Meeting”), each subject to the election and qualification of his or her successor or to his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. Other than Ms. Williams and Ms. Fallon, the terms of the other Class II and Class III Directors expire at the 2019 Annual Meeting and the 2020 Annual Meeting, respectively, and will not be voted upon at the Annual Meeting. The table below provides summary information about each of the Directors.

The Board has nominated and recommends a voteFOReach of Wellington J. Denahan, Michael Haylon and Donnell A. Segalas as Directors to hold office until the 2021 Annual Meeting,FORKatie Beirne Fallon as a Director to hold office until the 2020 Annual Meeting, andFORVicki Williams as a Director to hold office until the 2019 Annual Meeting. Unless you specify a contrary choice, the persons named in the enclosed proxy will vote in favor of these nominees. In the event that these nominees should become unavailable for election due to any presently unforeseen reason, the persons named in the proxy will have the right to use their discretion to vote for a substitute.

NameAgePrincipal OccupationIndependentCommittees
Wellington J. DenahanI5457Former Executive ChairmanYesNoJanuary 1997Compensation (Chair)
PR
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.Nominating/Corporate Governance
Risk
Kevin G. KeyesII47NoNovember 2012None
Kevin P. BradyII59YesJanuary 1997Audit (Chair)
Nominating/Corporate Governance
Risk
E. Wayne NordbergII76YesMay 2004Compensation
Nominating/Corporate Governance (Chair)
Jonathan D. GreenIII68YesJanuary 1997Compensation
Risk (Chair)
John H. SchaeferIII63YesMarch 2013Audit
Compensation
Risk
Francine J. BovichIII63YesMay 2014Audit



Table of Contents

Class I Directors

Wellington J. Denahanis Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Annaly. Ms. Denahan was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Annaly in November 2012. Previously, Ms. Denahan was appointed to serve as Co-Chief Executive Officer of Annaly in October 2012. Ms. Denahan was elected in December 1996 to serve as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors. Ms. Denahan was Annaly’s Chief Operating Officer from January 2006 to October 2012 and Chief Investment Officer from 2000 to November 2012. She was a co-founder of Annaly. Ms. Denahan has a B.A. in Finance from Florida State University.

The Board of Directors believes that Ms. Denahan’s qualifications include her significant oversight experience related to fixed income trading operations through years of serving as our Chief Operating Officer and Chief Investment Officer, her industry experience and expertise in the mortgage-backed securities markets, and her operational expertise.

Michael Haylon60was electedManaging DirectorYes

Audit
Conning, Inc.
Risk
Donnell A. Segalas60Chief Executive Officer andYes
Compensation
Managing Partner
(Chair)
Pinnacle Asset Management, L.P.
NCG
PR
Kevin G. Keyes50Chairman, Chief Executive OfficerNoand PresidentAnnaly Capital Management, Inc.Kevin P. Brady62Chief Executive OfficerYes
Audit (Chair)
ARMtech, LLC
NCG
Risk
E. Wayne Nordberg79ChairmanYes
Audit
Hollow Brook Wealth Management, LLC
Compensation
NCG
Vicki Williams45Senior Vice President Compensation,Yes
Audit
Benefits and HRIS
Compensation
NBCUniversalFrancine J. Bovich66Former Managing DirectorYes
NCG (Chair)
Morgan Stanley Investment Management
PR
Katie Beirne Fallon42Global Head of Corporate AffairsYes
NCG
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
PR
Jonathan D. Green*71Former Vice ChairmanYes
PR (Chair)
Rockefeller Group
Compensation
Risk
John H. Schaefer66Former President andYes
Risk (Chair)
Chief Operating Officer
Audit
Morgan Stanley Global Wealth Management
Compensation
*

Lead Independent Director. For more details, see page30.


Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement19


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance at Annaly

CLASS I DIRECTORS

Wellington J. Denahan

Director since
1997

Committees
PR, Risk

Ms. Denahan co-founded Annaly in June 2008 to serve1996 and has served as a Director. SinceDirector since that time. Until December 2017, Ms. Denahan served as Chairman of the Board of Annaly (from November 2012) and Executive Chairman of Annaly (from September 2015). Previously, Ms. Denahan served as Chief Executive Officer of Annaly from November 2012 to September 2015 and as Co-Chief Executive Officer of Annaly from October 2012 to November 2012. Ms. Denahan was Annaly’s Chief Operating Officer from January 2006 to October 2012 and Chief Investment Officer from 2000 to November 2012. Ms. Denahan received a B.S. in Finance from Florida State University.
Director Qualification Highlights
The Board believes that Ms. Denahan’s qualifications include her significant oversight experience related to fixed income trading operations through years of serving as Annaly’s Chief Operating Officer and Chief Investment Officer, her industry experience and expertise in the mortgage-backed securities markets, and her operational expertise, including her service as Annaly’s former Chief Executive Officer.

Michael Haylon

Director since
2008

Committees
Audit, Risk

Mr. Haylon has served as Managing Director and Head of Asset Management Sales, Products and Marketing at Conning, Inc., a global provider of investment management solutions, services and research to the insurance industry, since December 2014. Mr. Haylon previously served as Managing Director and Head of Investment Products at Conning, Inc. from January 2012 until December 2014. From September 2010 to December 2011, Mr. Haylon served as Head of Investment Product Management at General Re – New England Asset Management. He was Chief Financial Officer of the Phoenix Companies, Inc. from 2004 until 2007, and Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of the Phoenix Companies in 2002 and 2003. From 1995 until 2002, he held the position of Executive Vice President of Phoenix Investment Partners, Ltd., a NYSE-listed company, and President of Phoenix Investment Counsel, where he was responsible for the management and oversight of $25 billion in closed-end and open-end mutual funds, corporate pension funds and insurance company portfolios. From 1990 until 1994, he was Senior Vice President of Fixed-Income at Phoenix Home Life Insurance Company. From 1986 until 1990, he was Managing Director at Aetna Bond Investors where he was responsible for management of insurance company and pension fund portfolios. From 1980 until 1984, he was a Senior Financial Analyst at Travelers Insurance Companies. He began his career in 1979 in the commercial lending program at Philadelphia National Bank. Mr. Haylon has previously served on the boards of Aberdeen Asset Management and Phoenix Investment Partners. He hasMr. Haylon received a B.A. from Bowdoin College and a M.B.A. from the University of Connecticut.
Director Qualification Highlights

The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Haylon’s qualifications include his significant leadership and management experience from his years of management and oversight of large financial asset portfolios, his prior board experience with other companies and his expertise in financial matters.

20Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance at Annaly

Donnell A. Segalas

was elected in January Director since
1997 to serve as a Director.

Committees
Compensation (Chair),
NCG, PR

Mr. Segalas is Chair of the Compensation Committee, which provides oversight of the compensation paid to our Manager and also administers our equity incentive plan. Mr. Segalas ishas served as the Chief Executive Officer and a Managing Partner of Pinnacle Asset Management L.P., a New York-based alternative asset management firm.firm, since 2003. Additionally, Mr. Segalas is a member of Pinnacle’s Investment Committee and sits on the boards of theirits offshore funds. Prior to joining Pinnacle, in 2003, Mr. Segalas was Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer for AlternativesAlternative Investment Products at Phoenix Investment Partners. Mr. Segalas is a member of the Nantucket Historical Society. He received a B.A. from Denison University.
Director Qualification Highlights

The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Segalas’s qualifications include his significant experience from his years of investing and managing private and public investment vehicles and his experience serving on investment and executive committees withof other companies.

CLASS II DIRECTORS



Kevin G. Keyes

TableDirector since
2012

Chairman of Contentsthe Board

Mr. Keyes serves as Annaly’s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President. Mr. Keyes has served as Chairman since January 2018, Chief Executive Officer since September 2015 and President since October 2012. Previously, Mr. Keyes served as Chief Strategy Officer and Head of Capital Markets of Annaly from September 2010 until October 2012. Prior to joining Annaly as a Managing Director in 2009, Mr. Keyes worked for 20 years in senior investment banking and capital markets roles. From 2005 until 2009, Mr. Keyes served in senior management and business origination roles in the Global Capital Markets and Banking Group at Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Prior to that, he worked at Credit Suisse First Boston from 1997 until 2005 in various capital markets origination roles and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter from 1990 until 1997 in the Mergers and Acquisitions Group and Real Estate Investment Banking Group. Mr. Keyes received a B.A. in Economics and a B.S. in Business Administration (ALPA Program) from the University of Notre Dame.
Class II DirectorsDirector Qualification Highlights

The Board believes that Mr. Keyes brings to the Board a deep understanding of issues that are important to the Company’s growth through his roles as Annaly’s Chairman, CEO and President, and has demonstrated leadership qualities, management capability, business and industry knowledge and a long-term strategic perspective. In addition, Mr. Keyes’ qualifications include over 20 years of experience as an investment banking and equity capital markets professional.

Kevin P. Brady

was elected in January 1997 to serve as a Director and is Chair of the since
1997

Committees
Audit Committee, with oversight for financial disclosure, audit and general accounting activities. (Chair), NCG,
Risk

Mr. Brady ishas served as the Chief Executive Officer of ARMtech, LLC, a venture capital firm he founded that invests and incubates technology start-ups, since 2007. ARMtech’s current portfolio includes companies in the financial reporting and data spaces. Prior to ARMtech, Mr. Brady founded TaxStream, a software company that he foundedspecialized in 2007, which is dedicated to the financial reporting, market. In January of 2008, ThomsonReuters acquired TaxStream, a software company founded bytax and internal controls for multinational corporations. Mr. Brady. Prior to the acquisition, heBrady served as Chief Executive Officer of TaxStream providing product expertise, managementfrom 2002 to 2008, when the company was sold to Thomson-Reuters. Mr. Brady previously worked for eight years at PricewaterhouseCoopers in New York City, where he consulted on M&A transactions and strategic direction for the company. Mr. Bradyinternational tax issues. He was awarded a patent from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (No. 7627504) for the invention of the TaxStream product. Mr. Brady worked in various accounting and tax positions at PricewaterhouseCoopers from 1986 to 1994 and Merck from 1980 to 1986. Mr. Brady holdsreceived a B.A. from McGill University, ana M.B.A. from New York University and is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive).
Director Qualification Highlights

The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Brady’s qualifications include his expertise in financial and accounting matters as well as his significant experience managing systems and companies focusing on the financial accounting market.

Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement21


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance at Annaly

E. Wayne Nordberg

was elected in May 2004 to serve as a Director and is Chair of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. Since 2008 hesince
2004

Committees
Audit, Compensation,
NCG

Mr. Nordberg has served as Chairman of Hollow Brook Wealth Management, LLC, a SEC registeredSEC-registered investment advisor whichthat manages or advises $1.4 billion$900 million of investment assets.assets, since 2008. From January 2003 to November 2008, Mr. Nordberg served as a senior director of Ingalls & Snyder LLC, an NYSE member and registered investment advisor. From 1998 to June 2002, Mr. Nordberg served as Vice Chairman of the board of KBW Asset Management, Inc., an affiliate of Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., a registered investment advisor. From 1988 to 1998, he served in various capacities for Lord Abbett & Co., a mutual fund company, including as partner and director of theirits family of funds. Mr. Nordberg received his B.A. from Lafayette College, where he is a trustee emeritus. He is a member of the Financial Analysts Federation and Thethe New York Society of Security Analysts and is a Trustee of the Atlantic Salmon Federation, Thethe American Museum of Fly Fishing Glynwood Center and the National Wildlife Federation Endowment Fund. Mr. Nordberg is also a director of PetroQuest Energy, Inc. and Reaves Utility Income Fund, both NYSE-listed companies. Mr. Nordberg received a B.A. from Lafayette College, where he is a trustee emeritus.
Director Qualification Highlights

The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Nordberg’s qualifications include his significant experience in serving at a senior executive level with a SEC registeredSEC-registered investment advisor, his experience as a director of an asset management company and his service as a board member of other public companies.

Vicki Williams

Director since
2018

Kevin G. KeyesCommittees
isAudit, Compensation

Ms. Williams has served as Senior Vice President, Compensation, Benefits and HRIS at NBCUniversal, a multinational media conglomerate, and has over 17 years of compensation and governance experience. In addition to overseeing Compensation, Benefits and HRIS, she also oversees human resources support for corporate legal, human resources, communications, diversity, social responsibility and corporate events for NBCUniversal. Prior to joining NBCUniversal, Ms. Williams was a Partner with Pay Governance LLC and a Principal with Towers Perrin (now Willis Towers Watson). Ms. Williams received a B.S. in Mathematics and Education and a M.B.A. with a concentration in finance and quantitative statistics, each with honors from the University of Georgia.
Director Qualification Highlights
The Board believes that Ms. Williams’s qualifications include her broad human resources, executive compensation and governance experience, including serving as a senior-level human resources executive at a multinational company and as an external compensation consultant.

22Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance at Annaly

CLASS III DIRECTORS

Francine J. Bovich

Director since
2014

Committees
NCG (Chair), PR

Ms. Bovich has over 30 years of investment management experience lastly serving as a Managing Director of Morgan Stanley Investment Management from 1993-2010. Since 2011, Ms. Bovich has been a trustee of The Bradley Trusts. Ms. Bovich has also served as a board member of The Dreyfus Family of Funds since 2012, and serves as a board member of a number of registered investment companies within the fund complex. These funds represent a broad scope of investment strategies including equities (U.S., non-U.S., global, and emerging markets), taxable fixed income (US, non-US, global and emerging markets), municipal bonds, and cash management. From 1991 through 2005, Ms. Bovich served as the U.S. Representative to the United Nations Investment Committee, which advised a global portfolio of approximately $30 billion. Ms. Bovich is also a member of the BoardEconomic Club of Directors. Prior to being named to his current role, Mr. Keyes served as Chief Strategy OfficerNew York and Headan emeritus trustee of Capital Markets at Annaly. Mr. Keyes has over 20 yearsConnecticut College and chair of Capital Markets andthe Investment Banking experience. He joined Annaly in 2009 from Bank of America Merrill Lynch where he served in various senior management and business origination roles since 2005. Prior to that, Mr. Keyes also worked at Credit Suisse First Boston from 1997 until 2005 in various capital markets roles and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter from 1990 until 1997 in various investment banking positions. Mr. Keyes hasSub-Committee for its endowment. Ms. Bovich received a B.A. in Economics from Connecticut College and a B.S.M.B.A. in Business Administration (ALPA Program)Finance from New York University.
Director Qualification Highlights
The Board believes that Ms. Bovich’s qualifications include her significant investment management experience and her experience serving as a trustee and board member.

Katie Beirne Fallon

Director since
2018

Committees
NCG, PR

Ms. Fallon has served as Global Head of Corporate Affairs for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc., a multinational hospitality company, since November 2016, where she is responsible for managing the company’s communications, government relations and corporate responsibility efforts. Prior to Hilton, from 2014 to 2016, Ms. Fallon was Senior Advisor and Director of Legislative Affairs for President Obama. Before becoming the President’s chief liaison to the Hill, Ms. Fallon served from May 2013 to December 2013 as President Obama’s Deputy Communications Director at the White House where she devised and executed communications strategies for the President to promote his economic agenda across the country. From 2011 until May 2013, Ms. Fallon was the Staff Director of the Senate Democratic Policy and Communications Center in the U.S. Congress. Ms. Fallon’s prior roles in government and politics include Legislative Director to Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Deputy Staff Director of the Joint Economic Committee and Policy Director at the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Ms. Fallon received a B.A. in Government and International Studies from the University of Notre Dame.Dame and as a Marshall Scholar received a M.A. in Conflict Regulation from Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland and a M.Sc. in Comparative Politics from the London School of Economics.
Director Qualification Highlights

The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Keyes’sMs. Fallon’s qualifications include his over 20 years ofher significant experience in investment bankingserving at a senior executive level with a multinational public company and her experience serving as an equity capital markets professional as well as his rolea top leadership aide in our operations management and oversightthe highest levels of our strategic planning and deep understanding of issues that are important to the company’s growth.

U.S. government.


Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy StatementTable of Contents23



Table of ContentsClass III Directors

Corporate Governance at Annaly

Jonathan D. Green

was elected in January 1997 to serve as a Director and is our lead independent since
1997

Committees
PR (Chair),
Compensation, Risk

Lead Independent
Director and Chair of the Risk Committee. Since January 2011,

Mr. Green has served as a special advisor to Rockefeller Group International, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Mitsubishi Estate Company, Ltd., operating under the brand of Thethe Rockefeller Group.Group, from January 2011 until December 2014. He joined Thethe Rockefeller Group in 1980 as Assistant Vice President and Real Estate Counsel. In 1983, he was appointed Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel, and in 1990 was elected Chief Corporate Officer. On July 6,In 1995, he was named President and Chief Executive Officer of Rockefeller Group Development Corporation and Rockefeller Center Management Corporation, both subsidiaries of Thethe Rockefeller Group. In October 2002, Mr. Green was named President and Chief Executive Officer of Rockefeller Group International, Inc., becoming Vice Chairman in January 2009. He served as Vice Chairman until December 2010. In his role as Vice Chairman, Mr. Green was active in formulating the strategic planning for the company and its subsidiaries, which include Rockefeller Group Development Corporation, Rockefeller Group Investment Management, Rockefeller Group Technology Solutions, Inc. and Rockefeller Group Business Centers. Before joining Thethe Rockefeller Group, Mr. Green was associated with the New York City law firm of Thacher, Proffitt & Wood. He also serves on the board of trustees of the Wildlife Conservation Society. Mr. Green graduated from Lafayette College and the New York University School of Law.
Director Qualification Highlights

The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Green’s qualifications include his significant experience as a chief executive, his diverse and significant background in the real estate industry and his legal expertise.


John H. Schaefer

was elected in March Director since
2013 to serve as a Director.

Committees
Risk (Chair), Audit,
Compensation

Mr. Schaefer has over 3040 years of financial services experience including serving as a member of the management committee of Morgan Stanley from 1998 through 2005 and as2005. He was President and Chief Operating Officer of the Global Wealth Management division of Morgan Stanley.Stanley from 2000 to 2005. Mr. Schaefer retiredwas Executive Vice President and Chief Strategic and Administrative Officer of Morgan Stanley from 1998 to 2000. From 1997 to 1998, he was Managing Director and Head of Strategic Planning and Capital Management. Prior to the 1997 merger of Dean Witter, Discover and Morgan Stanley, Mr. Schaefer was Executive Vice President, Investment Banking and Head of Corporate Finance at Dean Witter, a position he had held since 1991. He began his investment banking career at E.F. Hutton & Company in February 2006 and from 2008 through 20121976. Mr. Schaefer served as a board member and chair of the audit committee of USI Holdings Corporation. Mr. Schaefer hasCorporation from 2008 through 2012. He received a B.B.A. in Accounting from the University of Notre Dame and ana M.B.A. from the Harvard Graduate School of Business.
Director Qualification Highlights

The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Schaefer’s qualifications include his broad financial services management experience, including management of strategic planning, capital management, human resources, internal audit and corporate communications, as well as his board and audit committee experience.


Francine J. Bovich24Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance at Annaly

INDEPENDENCE OF DIRECTORS

Annaly’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and NYSE rules require that at least a majority of Board members are Independent Directors. The Board has adopted the definition of “independent director” set forth in Section 303A of the NYSE rules and has affirmatively determined that each Director (other than Ms. Denahan and Mr. Keyes) has no material relationships with the Company (either directly or as partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us) and is therefore independent under all applicable criteria for independence in accordance with the standards set forth in the NYSE rules and Annaly’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.

was electedTwo new, highly qualified
female Independent Directors
joined the Annaly Board in May 20142018

DIRECTOR NOMINATION PROCESS

The NCG Committee is responsible for identifying and screening nominees for Director and for recommending to the Board candidates for nomination for election or re-election to the Board and to fill Board vacancies. The NCG Committee also seeks to maintain an ongoing list of potential Board candidates. Nominees may be suggested by Directors, members of management,stockholders or professional search firms. In evaluating a Director nomination, the NCG Committee may review materials provided by the nominator, a professional search firm or any other party.

The NCG Committee seeks to
maintain an ongoing list of
potential Board candidates

DIRECTOR CRITERIA AND QUALIFICATIONS

The NCG Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience and capability on the Board and considers a wide range of factors when assessing potential Director nominees, including a candidate’s background, skills, expertise, diversity, accessibility and availability to serve effectively on the Board. All candidates should (i) possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, exercise good business judgment and be committed to representing the long-term interests of the Company and its stockholders, and (ii) have an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment. It is expected that all Directors will have an understanding of the Company’s business and be willing to devote sufficient time and effort to carrying out their duties and responsibilities effectively.

BOARD REFRESHMENT AND DIVERSITY

Director Tenure

On an annual basis, the NCG Committee evaluates the Board’s overall composition, including Director tenure, and rigorously evaluates all Directors to ensure a continued match of their skill sets against the needs of the Company. The NCG Committee seeks to achieve a balance between the deep knowledge and understanding of Annaly’s business that comes from longer-term service on the Board with the fresh ideas and perspectives that comes from having newer Directors on the Board. And although the NCG Committee does not have a formal diversity policy, it recognizes the importance of having a Board representing diverse backgrounds and a broad set of experiences at policy-making levels in business, finance, government, education, law and technology, and in other areas that are relevant to the Company’s business and its status as a public company.

Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement25


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance at Annaly

The NCG Committee’s annual evaluation of the Board’s composition also informs Board succession planning, and contributed to the appointment, effective January 1, 2018, of two new Independent Directors (Ms. Fallon and Ms. Williams) with skills and backgrounds that complement the Company’s highly qualified Board. Ms. Fallon and Ms. Williams were respectively identified as potential Director nominees by the CEO and another member of senior management. Ms. Fallon and Ms. Williams were nominated by the NCG Committee after an extensive and careful search was conducted, and numerous other candidates proposed by Directors, members of management and professional search firms were considered.

STOCKHOLDER RECOMMENDATION OF DIRECTOR CANDIDATES

Stockholders who wish the NCG Committee to consider their recommendations for Director candidates should submit their recommendations in writing to the Chief Legal Officer and Secretary at the Company’s principal executive offices. Following verification of the stockholder status of persons proposing candidates, recommendations are aggregated and considered by the NCG Committee at a regularly scheduled or special meeting. If any materials are provided by a stockholder in connection with the nomination of a Director candidate, such materials are forwarded to the NCG Committee. Properly submitted recommendations by stockholders will receive the same consideration by the NCG Committee as other suggested nominees.

THE BOARD’S ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The Company is committed to maintaining a strong ethical culture and robust governance practices that benefit the long-term interests of stockholders, which include:

DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
AND OVERSIGHT
DIRECTOR
QUALIFICATIONS
STOCKHOLDER
RIGHTS AND
ENGAGEMENT
GOOD
GOVERNANCE/
CORPORATE
CITIZENSHIP
9 of 11 Directors are Independent
Robust Lead Independent Director role
Regular executive sessions of Independent Directors
Independent key Board committees
Board oversees a Director. Ms. Bovich has over 30 years of investment management experience lastly serving as a Managing Director of Morgan Stanley Investment Management from 1993-2010. Since 2011, Ms. Bovich has been a trustee of succession plan for the CEO and other senior executives
The Bradley Trusts. Ms. Bovich has also served as a board member of The Dreyfus Family of Funds since 2011, including currently serving as a board member of 46 registered investment companies within the fund complex. These funds represent a broad scope of investment strategies including equities (US, non US, global, and emerging markets), taxable fixed income (US, global, non US, and emerging markets), municipal bonds, and cash management. From 1991 through 2005, Ms. Bovich served as the U.S. Representative to the United Nations Investment Committee, which advised a global portfolio of approximately $30 billion. Ms. BovichBoard is a member of The Economic Club of New York, an emeritus trustee of Connecticut College and chairFull Board Member of the Investment Sub-Committee for its endowment, and a director of Hill House, Inc. Ms. Bovich has a B.A. in Economics from Connecticut College, New London, CT and an M.B.A. in Finance from New York University.NACD

The Board

36% of Directors believes that Ms. Bovich’s qualifications include her significant investment management experienceare women
4 of 11 Directors have tenure of less than 5 years
Annual Board, committee and her experience serving as a trustee and board member.


individual Director self-evaluations

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE,
BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES

Corporate Governance

We believe that we have implemented effective corporate governance policies and observe good corporate governance procedures and practices. We have adopted aOver-boarding policy limits the number of written policies, including corporate governanceoutside boards on which Directors can serve

2 “audit committee financial experts”
Majority vote standard for uncontested elections
Annual stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation
Stockholders may amend the bylaws by a majority of votes entitled to be cast
Stockholders can submit questions for the Annual Meeting through an interactive pre-meeting forum
Clawback policy with Manager
Director and employee stock ownership guidelines code of business conduct and ethics and charters for our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and Risk Committee.

Board Oversightcreated new Public Responsibility Committee
Launched joint venture dedicated to supporting community development in underserved cities
Member of Riskthe 2018 Bloomberg Gender-Equality Index

26Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance at Annaly

BOARD OVERSIGHT OF RISK

FULL BOARD

TheRisk management begins with the Board, through review and oversight of Directors is responsible for overseeing ourthe Company’s risk management framework, and continues with executive management, through ongoing formulation of risk management practices and committees of the Board of Directors assist itrelated execution in fulfilling this responsibility.managing risk. The Board of Directors established the Risk Committee, which is comprised solely of independent Directors, to assist the Board of Directors in theexercises its oversight of our risk governance structure; our risk management and risk assessment guidelines and policies regarding market, credit and liquidity and funding risk; our risk tolerance, including risk tolerance levels and capital targets and limits; and our capital, liquidity, and funding.

As required by its charter, the Audit Committee has oversight for certain aspects of risk management including review of the major franchise, reputational, legal and compliance exposures of the company, as well as, in coordination with theprimarily through its Risk Committee guidelines and policies that govern the process for risk assessment and risk management.Audit Committee. At least annually, the Audit Committeefull Board reviews with management ourthe Company’s risk management program, which identifies and quantifies a broad spectrum of enterprise-wide risks and related action plans. In 2014, our fullplans, with management

RISK COMMITTEE

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Assists the Board of Directors participated in this review and discussion and expects to continue this practice as part of its role in the oversight of ourthe Company’s risk governance structure, risk management practices. In addition, employees of our subsidiaries and our Manager report torisk assessment guidelines and policies, and risk appetite, including risk appetite levels and capital targets and limits

Assists the Risk Committee on various matters related to our risk exposures on a regular basis or more frequently, if appropriate. At their discretion, membersBoard in its oversight of the Boardquality and integrity of Directors may also directly contactthe Company’s accounting, internal controls and financial reporting practices, including appointing the independent auditor and reviewing its qualifications, performance and independence, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements


MANAGEMENT

Responsible for day-to-day risk assessment and risk management. A series of management to review and discuss any risk-related or other concerns that may arise between regular meetings. Our Board of Directors reviewed with our Compensation Committee itscommittees have decision-making responsibilities for risk assessment of risk and risk management applicable to our compensation policiesactivities. These management committees include the Operating Committee, Enterprise Risk Committee, the Asset and practices. Please seeLiability Committee, the Compensation DiscussionInvestment Committee and Analysis section of this proxy statement for a discussion of this assessment.

Independence of Our Directors

New York Stock Exchange rules require that at least a majority of our Directors be independent of our companythe Financial Reporting and management. Disclosure Committee


In addition to the risk oversight processes outlined above, the Board reviews its risk assessment of the Company’s compensation policies and practices applicable to the Company’s equity incentive plans with the Compensation Committee. For additional information on this review, please see the “Risks Related to Compensation Policies and Practices” section of this Proxy Statement. For additional information on the responsibilities of the Risk Committee and the Audit Committee, please see the “Board Committees” section of this Proxy Statement.

The rules also require that ourAudit and Risk Committees
have primary Board of Directors affirmatively determine that there are no material relationships between a Director and us (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us) before such Director can be deemed independent. We have adopted independence standards consistent with New York Stock Exchange rules. None oversight
of the corporationsCompany’s risk
management framework

MANAGEMENT SUCCESSION PLANNING

The Board oversees and maintains a succession plan for the CEO and other senior executives. In carrying out this function, the Board endeavors to ensure that the Company’s management has the capabilities to cause the Company to operate in an efficient and business-like fashion in the event of a vacancy in senior management, whether anticipated or sudden.

Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement27


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance at Annaly

BOARD COMMITMENT AND OVER-BOARDING POLICY

In order to provide sufficient time for informed participation in their Board responsibilities:

Directors who also serve as chief executive officers or organizations that have employed anyhold equivalent positions at other companies should not serve on more than two other boards of our independentpublic companies in addition to the Company’s Board;
Other Directors duringshould not serve on more than four other boards of public companies in addition to the past five years is a parent, subsidiary or other affiliate of Annaly. In addition, our Board of Directors has reviewed both directCompany’s Board; and indirect transactions and relationships that each of our Directors had or maintained with us, our management and employees of our subsidiaries. As a result of this review, our Board of Directors, based upon the fact that none of Kevin P. Brady, Jonathan D. Green, Michael Haylon, E. Wayne Nordberg, Donnell A. Segalas, John H. Schaefer and Francine J. Bovich have any relationships with us other than as Directors and holders of our common stock, affirmatively determined that these seven Directors are independent under New York Stock Exchange rules. Wellington J. Denahan and Kevin G. Keyes are not considered independent because they are officers
A member of the company.Audit Committee should not serve on the audit committee of more than two other public companies.

All Directors are currently in compliance with this policy. Directors are required to notify the Chairman of the Board and the chair of the NCG Committee in advance of accepting an invitation to serve on another public company board.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD

Stockholders and other persons interested in communicating with an individual Director (including the Lead Independent Director), the Independent Directors as a group, any committee of the Board or the Board as a whole, may do so by submitting such communication to:

Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
[Addressee]
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Phone: 1-888-8 ANNALY
Facsimile: (212) 696-9809
Email: investor@annaly.com

The Legal Department reviews communications to the Directors and forwards those communications related to the duties and responsibilities of the Board to the appropriate parties. Certain items such as business solicitation or advertisements, product-related inquiries, junk mail or mass mailings, resumes or other job-related inquiries, spam and unduly hostile, threatening, potentially illegal or similarly unsuitable communications will not be forwarded.

Stockholders may Communicate with any Director, Including the

Lead Independent Director

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Approval of Related Party Transactions

Each of Annaly’s Directors, Director nominees and executive officers is required to report all transactions with the Company in which they or an immediate family member had or will have a direct or indirect material interest in an annual disclosure questionnaire and on an on-going basis. Management reviews these annual questionnaires and requires interim reports and, if determined to be necessary, discusses any reported transactions with the entire Board. Other than as discussed in this section, there were no reported transactions for 2017 and there is no transaction currently pending for 2018. The Board does not, however, have a formal written policy for approval or ratification of such transactions, and all such transactions are evaluated on a case-by-case basis. If management believes a transaction could be a related party transaction or could raise particular conflict of interest issues, it will discuss it with legal counsel, and if necessary, the Board will form an Independent committee that has the right to engage its own legal and financial counsel to evaluate, approve or ratify the transaction.

28Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance at Annaly

Management Agreement

The Company has entered into a management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with the Manager. Management of the Company is conducted by the Manager through the authority delegated to it in the Management Agreement and pursuant to the policies established by Annaly’s Board. The Independent Directors periodically review the Management Agreement with the assistance of separate legal and financial advisors, who are selected and retained by the Independent Directors. The Management Agreement was effective as of July 1, 2013 and was amended in November 2014 and then amended and restated in April 2016, and may be further amended by agreement between the Manager and the Company.

The Management Agreement’s current term ends on December 31, 2018 and will automatically renew for successive two-year terms unless at least two-thirds of the Independent Directors or the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock elect to terminate the agreement in their sole discretion and for any or no reason. At any time during the term or any renewal term, either party may deliver to the other party prior written notice of its intention to terminate the Management Agreement no less than one year prior to its proposed termination date or, but only in the event the Manager is the terminating party, such earlier date as determined by the Company in its sole discretion. There is no termination fee for a termination of the Management Agreement by either the Manager or the Company.

See also “Disclosure Enhancements” on page42 for a discussion of compensation paid by the Manager to the NEOs.

The Management Agreement provides that during its term and, in the event of termination of the Management Agreement by the Manager without cause, for a period of one year following such termination, the Manager will not, without the Company’s prior written consent, manage any REIT, which engages in the management of mortgage-backed securities in any geographical region in which the Company operates.

Pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement, the Company pays the Manager a monthly management fee equal to 1/12th of 1.05% of the Company’s stockholders’ equity, as defined in the Management Agreement, for its management services. The Company incurred approximately $164.3 million in management fees under the Management Agreement during the year ended December 31, 2017.

The Manager

The Manager is a Delaware limited liability company and is indirectly owned by certain members of senior management. For additional information about the Manager, please see “Management Structure”, “Compensation Paid by the Manager to the Named Executive Officers” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

The management fee of Contents1.05% of
stockholders’ equity (as defined
in the Management Agreement)
compares favorably to the
industry average



Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy StatementBoard Leadership Structure29

Wellington J. Denahan, one of our founders, is our Chairman of the Board



Table of Contents

Board Structure and Processes

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

The Board believes that whether to have the same person occupy the offices of Chairman of the Board and CEO should be decided by the Board, from time to time, in its business judgment after considering relevant factors, including the specific needs of the business and what is in the best interests of the Company at that point in time. Under the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Independent Directors will annually select an Independent Director to serve as Lead Independent Director when the CEO and Chairman of the Board roles are combined or if the Chairman is not otherwise independent. Currently, Mr. Keyes serves as Chairman, CEO and President, while Mr. Green serves as Lead Independent Director.

The Board believes that the current leadership structure provides effective independent oversight of management, while allowing both the Board and management to benefit from Mr. Keyes’s day-to-day familiarity with the Company’s business.

The Lead Independent Director
has significant authority
and Chief Executive Officer. We believe that a combined Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer position, together with independent Directors serving as members and chairs of each of our Board committees, and regularly scheduled sessionsresponsibilities


THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARDTHE LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR
Presides at full meetings of the Board and committees is the most appropriateAnnual Meeting of Stockholders
Meets with the Lead Independent Director to receive feedback from executive sessions of Independent Directors
Communicates with all Directors on key issues and concerns outside of Board leadership structure for usmeetings
Advises on the selection of committee chairs
Draws on his knowledge of the Company’s business, operations, industry and competitive developments in setting Board agendas
Consults with the Lead Independent Director to ensure that Board agendas and information empower the Board to fulfill its responsibilities
Has authority to call special meetings of the Board if necessary and otherwise updates Directors between meetings through one-on-one or group phone calls
Authorizes the retention of advisors and consultants who report to management
Presents the Company’s message and strategy to stockholders, employees and regulators
Presides at this time. Experiencedall meetings of the Board in the absence of or at the request of the Chairman, including executive sessions of Independent Directors
Facilitates communication between the Independent Directors and independent Directors, sitting on and chairing various committees, oversee our operations, risks, performance and business strategy. Our Board believes that for us, the combination of the Chairman of the Board and CEO
Advises on the selection of Directorscommittee chairs
Approves the quality, quantity and Chief Executive Officer positions takes advantagetimeliness of Ms. Denahan’s talentinformation sent to the Board
Approves Board meeting agendas
Approves Board meeting schedules to assure there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items
Has authority to call meetings of the Independent Directors
Authorizes the retention of outside advisors and knowledgeconsultants who report directly to the Board
If requested by stockholders, ensures that he is available, when appropriate, for consultation and effectively combines the responsibilities for strategy development and executiondirect communication with management of day-to-day operations. We also believe it provides us with clear leadership lines and reduces the potential for confusion or duplication of efforts.

Our Board believes that given its strong governance practices, including the requirement that a majority of its members be independent, the combination of these two roles, provide an appropriate balance among strategy development, operational execution and independent oversight. In addition, in February 2015, the independent Directors approved the creation of a lead independent Director role.major stockholders

The Board believes that its independent oversight function is further enhanced by its policy to hold regular executive sessions of the Independent Directors without management present and the fact that a majority of the Company’s Directors (and every member of the Board’s three key committees) is independent.

EXECUTIVE SESSIONS OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

The Corporate Governance Guidelines require that the Board have at least two regularly scheduled executive sessions of Independent Directors each year. These executive sessions, which are designed to promote unfettered discussions among the Independent Directors, are presided over by the Lead Independent Director, or in his or her absence, the chair of the Compensation Committee. During 2017, the Independent Directors, without the participation of Board members who are members of management, held five executive sessions.

Lead Independent Director30

The lead independent Director:

facilitates communication between the independent Directors and the Chairman of the Board ofDirectors;
advises on the selection of committee chairs;
presides at meetings of the Board of Directors in the absence of or at the request of the Chairmanof the Board of Directors; and
makes himself or herself available for consultation or direct communication with major stockholders.

The lead independent Director is appointed annually by the independent Directors and Jonathan Green has been appointed to serve as the initial lead independent Director.

Board Committees, Charters and Policies

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which sets forth the basic principles and guidelines for resolving various legal and ethical questions that may arise in the workplace and in the conduct of our business. This code is applicable to our Directors, officers and all employees of our subsidiaries as well as our Manager.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

We have adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines which, in conjunction with the charters and key practices of our Board committees, provide the framework for the governance of our company.

Other Charters

Our Compensation Committee, Audit Committee, Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and Risk Committee have also adopted written charters which govern their conduct.



Table of Contents

Where You Can Find These Documents

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Compensation Committee Charter, Audit Committee Charter, Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Charter and Risk Committee Charter are available on our website (www.annaly.com). We will provide copies of these documents free of charge to any stockholder who sends a written request to Investor Relations, Annaly Capital Management Inc., 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036.

Hedging Policy

We have a policy prohibiting all Directors, officers and all employees of our subsidiaries as well as our Manager from engaging in any hedging transactions with respect to our equity securities held by them, which includes the purchase of any financial instrument (including forward contracts and zero cost collars) designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of such equity securities.

Compensation Committee

We have a standing Compensation Committee. The members of our Compensation Committee are Donnell A. Segalas (Chair), Jonathan D. Green, E. Wayne Nordberg, and John H. Schaefer, each of whom is an independent Director within the meaning of the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. The Compensation Committee reviews the fees we pay to our Manager under our management agreement and administers our equity incentive plan and recommends changes to our equity incentive plan to our Board of Directors when appropriate. The Compensation Committee monitors from time to time any such payment and reserves the right to award compensation to the executives that may not qualify under Section 162(m) as deductible compensation. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code denies a tax deduction for compensation in excess of $1 million paid to its named executive officers unless the compensation is performance-based within the meaning of Section 162(m).

Audit Committee

We have a standing Audit Committee. The members of our Audit 2018 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

Board Structure and Processes

BOARD AND COMMITTEE EVALUATIONS

The Lead Independent Director and the NCG Committee are responsible for overseeing an annual self-evaluation process for the Board. The self-evaluation process seeks to identify specific areas, if any, that need improvement or strengthening in order to increase the effectiveness of the Board as a whole and its members and committees. In 2018, the Board adopted an enhanced Board self-evaluation process that includes annual assessments of the full Board, each Board committee and individual Directors. Such assessments will be facilitated by an external evaluator on a periodic basis. In addition to these formal self-evaluations, the Board considers its performance as well as that of its members and committees on an ongoing basis and shares relevant feedback with management.

DIRECTOR ORIENTATION AND CONTINUING EDUCATION

The Board believes that Director orientation and continuing education is critical to the Board’s ability to fulfill its responsibilities in a dynamic and constantly evolving business environment. New Directors participate in a robust onboarding process, which includes extensive training materials and personal briefings by senior management on the Company’s strategic plans, financial statements, and key policies and practices. In addition, the Company encourages Directors to participate in external continuing director education programs, and the Company provides reimbursement for related expenses. Continuing director education is also provided during Board meetings and as stand-alone information sessions outside of meetings. In line with the Company’s commitment to continuing board education, in 2017, the Board became a Full Board Member of the NACD, which gives Directors access to an extensive menu of board education programs, along with research on governance trends and board practices.

GOVERNING DOCUMENTS

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Conduct”), which sets forth the basic principles and guidelines for resolving various legal and ethical questions that may arise in the workplace and in the conduct of business. This Code of Conduct is applicable to Annaly’s Directors, executive officers and employees, and is also a “code of ethics” as defined in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K. The Company will make any legally required disclosures regarding amendments to, or waivers of, provisions of the Code of Conduct on the Company’s website.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that, in conjunction with the charters of the Board committees, provide the framework for governance of the Company.

Other Governance Policies

Annaly’s Directors, executive officers and employees are also subject to the Company’s other governance policies, including a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and Anti-Bribery Compliance Policy, an Insider Trading Policy, and a Regulation FD Policy.

Where You Can Find the Code of Conduct, Corporate Governance Guidelines and Committee Charters

The Code of Conduct, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Compensation Committee Charter, Audit Committee Charter, NCG Committee Charter, Public Responsibility Committee Charter and Risk Committee Charter are available on Annaly’s website (www.annaly.com). The Company will provide copies of these documents free of charge to any stockholder who sends a written request to Investor Relations, Annaly Capital Management, Inc., 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036.

Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement31


Table of Contents

Board Structure and Processes

BOARD COMMITTEES

The Board has five standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the NCG Committee, the Risk Committee and the recently-formed Public Responsibility Committee.

As part of the Board’s continuing review of its Board committee structure and responsibilities, and in response to dialogue with stockholders, the Board created the new Public Responsibility Committee in late 2017. At the same time, the Board reorganized the membership of most of its other committees.

The Board created the
new Public Responsibility
Committee in late 2017

The table below shows the current membership of each Board committee and number of meetings of each committee held in 2017.

Director     Audit
Committee
     Compensation
Committee
     NCG
Committee
     PR
Committee
     Risk
Committee
Francine J. Bovich
Kevin P. Brady
Wellington J. Denahan
Katie Beirne Fallon
Jonathan D. Green(1)
Michael Haylon
E. Wayne Nordberg
John H. Schaefer
Donnell A. Segalas
Vicki Williams
2017 Meetings:6240(2)5
•  Member        Chairperson
(1)Mr. Green serves as the Lead Independent Director. For more details, see page30.
(2)The Public Responsibility (“PR”) Committee did not hold any meetings in 2017, as it was established in November 2017.

32Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Board Structure and Processes

AUDIT COMMITTEE
Committee Members:
Kevin P. Brady (Chair), Francine J. Bovich,
Michael Haylon and
E. Wayne Nordberg
John H. Schaefer. Each memberSchaefer
Vicki Williams

Number of our Audit Committee is an independent Director withinMeetings:
6

Key Responsibilities:
Appoints the meaning of the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, and Mr. Brady has been designated as our Audit Committee’s financial expert. The Audit Committee recommends to our Board of Directors the engagement or discharge of independent registered public accountants,accounting firm and reviews its qualifications, performance and independence
Reviews the plan and results of the auditing engagement with ourthe Chief Financial Officer and ourthe independent registered public accountants,accounting firm
Oversees internal audit activities
Oversees the quality and reviews with our Chief Financial Officerintegrity of financial statements and financial reporting process
Oversees the scopeadequacy and natureeffectiveness of our internal auditing system. The activitiescontrol over financial reporting 
Reviews and pre-approves the audit and permitted non-audit services and proposed fees of the independent registered public accounting firm
Prepares the report of the Audit Committee are describedrequired by the rules of the SEC to be included in greater detail below under the caption “ReportProxy Statement

Each member of the Audit Committee.”Committee is financially literate and independent of the Company and management under the applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the listing standards of the NYSE. The Board has designated Messrs. Brady and Haylon as “audit committee financial experts” under applicable SEC rules.

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee

We have a standing Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. The membersFor more information on the Audit Committee’s responsibilities and activities, see the “Board Oversight of our Nominating/Corporate GovernanceRisk” and “Report of the Audit Committee are ” sections of this Proxy Statement.


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Committee Members:
Donnell A. Segalas
(Chair)
Jonathan D. Green
E. Wayne Nordberg
John H. Schaefer
Vickie Williams

Number of Meetings:
2

Key Responsibilities:
Evaluates the performance of the Manager and the terms of the Management Agreement
Reviews the fees payable to the Manager
Administers the Company’s equity incentive plans and other equity compensation programs
Reviews the form and amount of Director compensation
Evaluates the performance of the Company’s officers
Reviews and discusses with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and related disclosures as required by the SEC
Prepares the report of the Compensation Committee required by the rules of the SEC to be included in the Proxy Statement

Each member of the Compensation Committee is independent of the Company and management under the listing standards of the NYSE.

For more information on the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities and activities, see the “Compensation of Directors” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” sections of this Proxy Statement.


Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement33


Table of Contents

Board Structure and Processes

NCG COMMITTEE
Committee Members:
Francine J. Bovich
(Chair),
Kevin P. Brady and
Katie Beirne Fallon
E. Wayne Nordberg
Donnell A. Segalas. EachSegalas

Number of the members of our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee meets the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. Our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee (i)Meetings:
4

Key Responsibilities:
Develops and recommends criteria for the selection of new Directors, identifiesconsidering potential Board candidates
Identifies and screens individuals qualified to become Board members, and recommends to the Board of Directors personscandidates for nomination for election or re-election to be nominated as Directors or to be electedthe Board and to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors; (ii) developsvacancies
Develops and recommends to the Board of Directors a set of corporate governance principles; (iii) providesguidelines and recommends modifications as appropriate
Provides oversight of the evaluation of the Board of Directors and management; and (iv) considersmanagement
Considers other corporate governance matters, such as Director retirement policies, management succession plans for management and potential conflicts of interest of members of the Board of Directorsmembers and senior management, and makes recommendations for change,recommends changes as appropriate. Our


appropriate

Table of Contents

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will consider nominees recommended by our stockholders. These recommendations should be submitted in writing to our Secretary.

Our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee currently considers the following factors in making its recommendations to the Board of Directors: background, skills, expertise, accessibility and availability to serve effectively on the Board of Directors. Our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee also conducts inquiries into the background and qualifications of potential candidates. Although the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal diversity policy, it believes that diversity is an important factor in determining the composition of the Board of Directors. Additionally, the committee believes that it is critical to have a Board of Directors with diverse backgrounds in various areas as this contributes to our success and is in the best interests of our stockholders.

Our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for Director. Our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee regularly assesses the appropriate size of the Board of Directors, and whether any vacancies on the Board of Directors are expected due to retirement or otherwise. In the event that vacancies are anticipated, or otherwise arise, our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee considers various potential candidates for Director. Candidates may come to the attention of our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee through current members of our Board of Directors, professional search firms, stockholders or other persons. These candidates are evaluated at regular or special meetings of our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and may be considered at any point during the year. As described above, our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee considers properly submitted stockholder nominations for candidates for the Board of Directors. Following verification of the stockholder status of persons proposing candidates, recommendations are aggregated and considered by our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee at a regularly scheduled or special meeting. If any materials are provided by a stockholder in connection with the nomination of a Director candidate, such materials are forwarded to our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. Our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee also reviews materials provided by professional search firms or other parties in connection with a nominee who is not proposed by a stockholder. In evaluating such nominations, our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience and capability on the Board of Directors.

Risk Committee

We have a standing Risk Committee. The members of our Risk Committee are Jonathan D. Green (Chair), Kevin P. Brady, Michael Haylon, and John H. Schaefer. Each member of the RiskNCG Committee is an independent Director within the meaning of the rulesCompany and management under the applicable listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The Risk NYSE.

For more information on the NCG Committee’s responsibilities and activities, see the “Director Nomination Process,” “Director Criteria and Qualifications”, “Board Refreshment and Diversity” and “Stockholder Recommendation of Director Candidates” section of this Proxy Statement.


PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE
Committee assistsMembers:
Jonathan D. Green
(Chair)
Francine J. Bovich
Wellington J. Denahan
Katie Beirne Fallon
Donnell A. Segalas

Number of Meetings:
N/A(1)

Key Responsibilities:

Assists the Board in theits oversight of our the Company’s items of public responsibility, including:

corporate philanthropy
social impact investments
sustainability initiatives
corporate culture and reputation
public policy initiatives
For more information on the formation of the Public Responsibility Committee, see the “Stockholder Outreach and Results of 2017 Say-on-Pay Vote” section of this Proxy Statement.

RISK COMMITTEE
Committee Members:
John H. Schaefer(Chair)
Kevin P. Brady
Wellington J. Denahan
Jonathan D. Green
Michael Haylon

Number of Meetings:
5

Key Responsibilities:

Assists the Board in its oversight of the Company’s: 

risk governance structure; our structure
risk management and risk assessment guidelines and policies regarding market, credit andcapital, liquidity and funding risk; our risk, tolerance,investment/market risk, credit risk, counterparty risk, operational risk, compliance, regulatory and legal risk and such other risks as necessary to fulfill the committee’s duties and responsibilities
risk appetite, including risk toleranceappetite levels and capital targets and limits; and our capital, liquidity, and funding.

limits

Board and Committee Meetings

During 2014, our Board of Directors held fourteen meetings. During 2014, the Compensation Committee held three meetings, the Audit Committee held five meetings, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee held two meetings, andFor more information on the Risk Committee’s responsibilities and activities, see the “Board Oversight of Risk” section of this Proxy Statement.

(1)The Public Responsibility Committee held fourdid not hold any meetings in 2017, as it was established in November 2017.

34Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Board Structure and Processes

DIRECTOR ATTENDANCE

During 2017, the Board held 13 meetings. Each Director attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings held by the Board and each committee on which the Director served during the period he or she was on such committee.

The Company expects each member of the Board to attend the Annual Meeting. All of the Company’s then-Directors attended Annaly’s 2017 annual meeting of stockholders (the “2017 Annual Meeting”). Ms. Fallon and Ms. Williams were appointed as Directors effective January 1, 2018 and, therefore, did not attend the 2017 Annual Meeting.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

The Company compensates the Independent Directors. Any Director who is also an employee or owner of the Manager does not receive compensation for serving on the Board. The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing, and recommending to the Board, the form and amount of compensation paid to the Independent Directors.

The compensation elements paid to the Independent Directors for service on the Board and its committees for 2017 is set forth below:

Annual Compensation ElementAmount
Annual Cash Retainer$100,000
Deferred Stock Unit (“DSU”) Grant$135,000 in DSUs
Lead Independent Director Retainer$30,000
Committee Member Retainer$8,000 – Audit Committee
$7,000 – Compensation Committee
$7,000 – Risk Committee
$5,000 – NCG Committee
Committee Chair Retainer(1)$20,000 – Audit Committee
$10,000 – Compensation Committee
$10,000 – Risk Committee
$10,000 – NCG Committee
(1)

Committee Chairs received Committee Chair Retainers in addition to, and not in lieu of, Committee Member Retainers. No retainers for service as a Member or Chair of the aggregate number of meetings held by our Board of Directors and 75% ofPublic Responsibility Committee were paid in 2017, as the aggregate number of meetings of each committee on which the Director served.did not meet during such year, having been established in November 2017.

Each DSU is equivalent in value to one share of the Company’s common stock. DSUs are granted on the date of the annual stockholder meeting and vest immediately. DSUs convert to shares of the Company’s common stock one year after the date of grant unless the Director elects to defer the settlement of the DSUs to a later date. DSUs do not have voting rights. DSUs pay dividend equivalents in either cash or additional DSUs at the election of the Director. The Independent Directors are also eligible to receive other stock-based awards under the Company’s equity incentive plan.

The Company reimburses the Directors for their reasonable out-of-pocket travel expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at full Board and committee meetings.

Director Stock Ownership Guideline

In 2016, the Board increased the stock ownership guideline for the Independent Directors to provide that each Independent Director should strive to own an amount of the Company’s common stock equal to five times the annual cash retainer. Shares counting toward the guideline include shares that are owned outright, DSUs and any other shares held in deferral accounts. To facilitate achievement of the guideline, the Board has adopted and implemented a “retention ratio” that requires Independent Directors to retain and hold 50% of the net profit shares from DSUs until the specified ownership level is achieved. As of March 31, 2017, all of the Independent Directors have met or are on their way to meeting their stock ownership guideline.


Table of Contents

We require each member ofIn 2016, the Board ofincreased the
stock ownership guideline for
Independent Directors to attend our 5x the
annual meeting of stockholders except for absences due to causes beyond the reasonable control of the Director. All of our Directors attended our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders.

Meetings of Independent Directors

Our corporate governance guidelines require that the Board have at least two regularly scheduled meetings each year for our independent Directors. These meetings,cash retainer, which are designed to promote unfettered discussions among our independent Directors, are presided over by our lead independent Director. In 2014, prior to the appointment of a lead independent Director, Kevin Brady, an independent Director, presided over these meetings. During 2014, our independent Directors, without the participation of Board members who are members of management, held two meetings.is
currently $100,000



Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement35


Table of Contents

Board Structure and Processes

Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant

During 2017, the Compensation Committee retained an independent compensation consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co. (“F. W. Cook”), to assist the Compensation Committee in its review of the compensation arrangements provided to the Independent Directors. The Compensation Committee considered F. W. Cook’s independence in light of SEC regulations and NYSE listing standards. The Compensation Committee discussed all relevant factors and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent F. W. Cook from independently representing the Compensation Committee.

Director Compensation

The table below summarizes the compensation paid by the Company to the Independent Directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

Name(1)     Fees Earned or
Paid
in Cash
     Stock
Awards
(2)
     Total
Francine J. Bovich$113,000$135,000$248,000
Kevin P. Brady$140,000$135,000$275,000
Jonathan D. Green$154,000$135,000$289,000
Michael Haylon$115,000$135,000$250,000
E. Wayne Nordberg$122,000$135,000$257,000
John H. Schaefer$122,000$135,000$257,000
Donnell A. Segalas$122,000$135,000$257,000
(1)

Communications with the Board of Directors

Interested persons may communicate their comments, complaints or concerns by sending written communicationsMs. Fallon and Ms. Williams were appointed to the Board of Directors, committeeseffective January 1, 2018 and did not receive any compensation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

(2)

The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the BoardDSU awards, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and based on the closing price of Directorsthe Company’s common stock on the date of grant. DSUs are vested at grant and individual Directors by mailing those communications to:accrue dividend equivalents as additional DSUs or cash at the election of the Director.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the aggregate unexercised option awards at December 31, 2017 of each of the Independent Directors. All such option awards have vested. Options are no longer granted as part of the Company’s Director compensation program.

NameUnexercised
Option
Awards at 12/31/17
Francine J. Bovich
Kevin P. Brady42,500
Jonathan D. Green90,000
Michael Haylon75,000
E. Wayne Nordberg90,000
John H. Schaefer
Donnell A. Segalas77,500

36Annaly Capital Management Inc.
[Addressee*]
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Phone: (212) 696-0100
Facsimile: (212) 696-9809
Email: investor@annaly.com
Attention: Investor Relations 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

*Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

Management

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the Company’s executive officers, all of whom are indirect owners and/or employees of the Manager:

NameAgeTitle
Kevin G. Keyes50Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
*Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
*Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors
*Risk Committee of the Board of Directors
*Independent Directors
*Lead Independent Director
*Name of individual Director

These communications are sent by us directly to the specified addressee.



Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT

The following sets forth certain information with respect to our executive officers:

NameAgeTitle
Wellington J. Denahan51Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
Kevin G. Keyes47President and Director
Glenn A. Votek56Chief Financial Officer
R. Nicholas Singh56Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

Biographical information on Ms. Denahan and Mr. Keyes is provided above. Certain biographical information for Mr. Votek and Mr. Singh is set forth below.

Glenn A. Votekwas appointed to serve as

59Chief Financial Officer of Annaly and our subsidiary Fixed Income Discount Advisory Company (“FIDAC”) in August 2013. Mr. Votek joined Annaly in May 2013 from CIT Group where he was an Executive Vice President and Treasurer since 1999 and President of Consumer Finance since 2012. Prior to that, Mr. Votek worked at AT&T and its finance subsidiary from 1986 until 1999 in various financial management roles. Mr. Votek has a B.S. in Finance and Economics from the University of Arizona/Kean College and a M.B.A. in Finance from Rutgers University.

R. Nicholas Singhis

David L. Finkelstein45Chief Investment Officer
Timothy P. Coffey44Chief Credit Officer
Anthony C. Green43Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

Biographical information on Mr. Keyes is provided above under the heading “Election of Directors.” Certain biographical information for Messrs. Votek, Finkelstein, Coffey and Green is set forth below.

Glenn A. Votekhas served as Chief Financial Officer of Annaly since August 2013. Mr. Votek also served as Chief Financial Officer of Fixed Income Discount Advisory Company, a former wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, from August 2013 until October 2015 and as Annaly’s Chief Administrative Officer from May 2013 until August 2013. Mr. Votek joined Annaly in May 2013 from CIT Group where he was an Executive Vice President and Treasurer since 1999 and President of Consumer Finance since 2012. Prior to that, Mr. Votek worked at AT&T and its finance subsidiary from 1986 until 1999 in various financial management roles. Mr. Votek has a B.S. in Finance and Economics from the University of Arizona/Kean College and a M.B.A. in Finance from Rutgers University.

David L. Finkelsteinhas served as Chief Investment Officer of Annaly since November 2016. Mr. Finkelstein previously served as Annaly’s Chief Investment Officer, Agency and RMBS beginning in February 2015 and as Annaly’s Head of Agency Trading beginning in August 2013. Prior to joining Annaly, Mr. Finkelstein served for four years as an Officer in the Markets Group of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York where he was the primary strategist and policy advisor for the MBS purchase program. Mr. Finkelstein has over 20 years of experience in fixed income investment. Prior to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Mr. Finkelstein held Agency MBS trading positions at Salomon Smith Barney, Citigroup Inc. and Barclays PLC. Mr. Finkelstein received his B.A. in Business Administration from the University of Washington and his M.B.A. from the University of Chicago, Booth School of Business. Mr. Finkelstein also holds the Chartered Financial Analyst®designation.

Timothy P. Coffeyhas served as Chief Credit Officer of Annaly since January 2016. Mr. Coffey served as Annaly’s Head of Middle Market Lending from 2010 until January 2016. Mr. Coffey has over 20 years of experience in leveraged finance and has held a variety of origination, execution, structuring and distribution positions. Prior to joining Annaly in 2010, Mr. Coffey served as Managing Director and Head of Debt Capital Markets in the Leverage Finance Group at Bank of Ireland. Prior to that, Mr. Coffey held positions at Scotia Capital, the holding company of Saul Steinberg’s Reliance Group Holdings, and SC Johnson International. Mr. Coffey received his B.A. in Finance from Marquette University.

Anthony C. Greenhas served as Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Annaly since March 2017. Mr. Green previously served as Annaly’s Deputy General Counsel from 2009 until February 2017. Prior to joining Annaly, Mr. Green was a partner in the Corporate, Securities, Mergers & Acquisitions Group at the law firm K&L Gates LLP. Mr. Green has over 18 years of experience in corporate and securities law. Mr. Green holds a B.A. in Economics and Political Science from the University of Pennsylvania and a J.D. and LL.M. in International and Comparative Law from Cornell Law School.

STOCK PURCHASES BY EXECUTIVE OFFICERS SINCE 2011

Since 2011, the executive officers have purchased over 1.4 million shares of the Company’s common stock (including open market purchases, dividend reinvestments, and option exercises) with an aggregate purchase price of $16.3 million as set forth in the table below.

Executive Officer     Shares
Purchased
     Purchase
Price
(1)






  
No NEO has ever
sold shares of
the Company’s
common stock

Kevin G. Keyes934,779$10,560,000
Glenn A. Votek93,597$1,017,000
David L. Finkelstein300,000$3,370,000
Timothy P. Coffey30,000$304,000
Anthony C. Green101,000$1,085,000
TOTAL1,459,376$16,336,000
(1)

Rounded to the nearest thousand.


Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement37


Table of Contents

Management Structure

OVERVIEW

Following the management externalization transaction (the “Externalization”), which was approved by holders of approximately 83% of the Company’s stock on May 23, 2013, the Company became externally-managed by the Manager. Pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement, the Company pays the Manager a management fee and the Manager pays all of the compensation to Annaly’s management personnel (including the NEOs). The Compensation Committee annually reviews the management fee and the performance of the Manager, including the achievements discussed beginning on page7. The Independent Directors then consider the Compensation Committee’s recommendations when determining whether to renew or amend the terms of the Management Agreement. Based on the review and factors described in more detail below, the Independent Directors have determined that the Management Agreement continues to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. For additional information, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions”, “Compensation Paid by the Manager to the Named Executive Officers” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
The Management Agreement
compares favorably to the
management agreements of
the Company’s externally-
managed peers

MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT TERMS

The Compensation Committee believes that the terms and conditions of the Management Agreement compare favorably to the terms and conditions that exist between Annaly’s externally-managed mREIT peers and their respective managers. In particular, as illustrated by the table below, when compared to the median for the peer comparison, (i) the management fee paid to the Manager is lower as a percentage of stockholders’ equity, (ii) the term of the Management Agreement was of a shorter duration, and (iii) the Management Agreement has no termination fee, which is expressed in the table below as a multiple of trailing average annual management fees.

        Mean        Median        Min        Max        Annaly
Agency Residential REITs
Base management fee(1)1.29%1.29%1.20%1.37%1.05%
Initial term in years6.06.02.010.02.0
Termination fee multiple(2)4.2x4.2x3.0x5.3xNone
Incentive feeNoneNoneNoneNoneNone
Commercial REITs
Base management fee1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.05%
Initial term in years2.83.02.03.02.0
Termination fee multiple3.2x3.0x3.0x4.0xNone
Incentive fee(3)20% above
8% hurdle

20% above
8% hurdle

None25% above
8% hurdle
None
Non-Agency Residential/Hybrid REITs
Base management fee(4)1.49%1.50%1.41%1.50%1.05%
Initial term in years4.03.01.015.02.0
Termination fee multiple(5)2.9x3.0x1.0x5.0xNone
Incentive fee(6)N/AN/A~15%
above
~12%
hurdle
35% above
12.5%
hurdle
None

Source: Public filings as of year ended December 31, 2017. All base management fees are calculated as a percentage of stockholders’ equity and all termination fees are calculated as a multiple of the average annual base management fee during the prior 24-month period, except as otherwise specified below. Agency Residential REITs represent the externally-managed agency mortgage REITs included in the BBREMTG Index as of December 31, 2017 and includes Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (“ANH”) and ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc. (“ARR”). Commercial REITs represent the externally-managed commercial mortgage REITs included in the BBREMTG Index as of December 31, 2017 and includes Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (“BXMT”), Ares Commercial Real Estate Corp. (“ACRE”), Resource Capital Corp. (“RSO”), Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. (“ARI”), Starwood Property Trust (“STWD”) and Sutherland Asset Management (“SLD”). Non-Agency Residential / Hybrid REITs represents the externally-managed non-agency

38Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Management Structure

residential and hybrid mortgage REITs included in the BBREMTG Index as of December 31, 2017 and includes New Residential Investment Corp. (“NRZ”), Two Harbors Investment Corp. (“TWO”), Invesco Mortgage Capital, Inc. (“IVR”), PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (“PMT”), MTGE Investment Corp. (“MTGE”), New York Mortgage Trust Inc. (“NYMT”), AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (“MITT”), Orchid Island Capital, Inc. (“ORC”), Western Asset Mortgage (“WMC”), Great Ajax Corp (“AJX”), Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corp. (“CHMI”), Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT (“EARN”), and Five Oaks Investment Corp. (“OAKS”).
(1)

For ARR, base management fee is calculated as 1.50% of gross equity raised up to $1.0 billion plus 0.75% of gross equity raised in excess of $1.0 billion.

(2)

ARR’s termination fee is calculated as the greater of (a) the base management fee calculated prior to the effective date of agreement termination for the remainder of the term or (b) 3x the base management fee during the preceding full 12 months.

(3)

Of the six Commercial REITs, five have incentive fees in addition to their base management fees. STWD and RSO have incentive fees of 20% above an 8% hurdle. BXMT has an incentive fee of 20% above a 7% hurdle. RSO has an incentive fee of 25% above an 8% hurdle. SLD has an incentive fee of 15% above an 8% hurdle. For purposes of this table, the calculation of the mean includes only the five Commercial REITs that have incentive fees.

(4)

NYMT only pays base management and incentive fees with respect to its distressed residential loan strategy. NYMT’s base management fee is calculated as 1.50% of invested capital in distressed residential mortgage loans.

(5)

NRZ’s termination fee is calculated using the prior 12-month period. Pursuant to the terms of its management agreement, PMT’s termination fee is calculated as a multiple of the base management fee and a performance incentive fee. For purposes of this table, any impact from this performance incentive fee on PMT’s termination fee multiple has been disregarded.

(6)

Of the 13 Non-Agency Residential/Hybrid REITs, four have incentive fees in addition to their base management fees. NRZ has an incentive fee of 25% above a 10% hurdle. PMT has an incentive fee with a sliding scale beginning above 8%. NYMT has an incentive fee of 35% above a 12.5% hurdle. AJX has an incentive fee of 20% above an 8% hurdle. For purposes of this table, the calculation of the mean includes only the four Non-Agency Residential/Hybrid REITs that have incentive fees.

STRUCTURE AND AMOUNT OF THE MANAGEMENT FEE

The Compensation Committee annually reviews both the structure of the management fee as well as the amount of such fee to determine whether they incentivize the Manager to work towards the Company’s desired goals to the benefit of long-term stockholder interests. The Compensation Committee has determined that the use of a management fee formulated as a percentage of stockholders’ equity (as defined in the Management Agreement) represents a responsible and prudent method of compensating the Manager. In particular, in the context of an mREIT that uses leverage as a key component of its business strategy, the Compensation Committee believes that providing for a contractually required payment structured as an “incentive fee” may misalign the goals of the Manager from those of the stockholders.

Moreover, the Compensation Committee believes that a management fee that is based upon stockholders’ equity (along with the stock ownership guidelines discussed on page47) aligns the management team to the goals of the Company, and that focusing the management fee on the preservation and growth of the Company’s book value incentivizes the Manager to achieve long-term performance that protects stockholders’ equity as realized losses decrease such equity and, ultimately, the management fee.

Additionally, for the Manager to earn a larger management fee, the stockholders’ equity of the Company would need to increase. As a result, the growth of the stockholders’ equity is an alignment between the interests of stockholders and the Manager. Further, this alignment is stronger in the REIT industry than in other businesses. REIT regulations require the Company to pay at least 90% of its earnings to stockholders as dividends. As a result, unlike most companies, Annaly cannot grow its business and book value by reinvesting its earnings. This places a unique market discipline on the Company.
The Compensation Committee
annually reviews the structure
and amount of the management
fee to determine whether it
appropriately incentivizes the
management team

The Compensation Committee also believes that the structure of the management fee is more favorable to the Company’s stockholders than if the fee was based on total assets under management, which could potentially incentivize an external manager to excessively leverage assets under management in an attempt to increase short-term incentive payouts.

Clawback for the Management Fee

Pursuant to the 2016 amendment and restatement of the Management Agreement, the Company is entitled to receive reimbursement from the Manager if the Board determines that a computation error (regardless of the reason for or amount of such error) resulted in the overpayment of a management fee to the Manager.

Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement39


Table of Contents

Management Structure

CONTINUED COST SAVINGS RELATED TO THE EXTERNALIZATION

The Compensation Committee believes that the Externalization has materially reduced the Company’s compensation-related costs. When comparing the management fees the Company paid for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 against the estimated compensation costs (including tax costs) the Company would have paid for the same period if those costs remained what they were in 2012, management estimates that the Externalization has resulted in total compensation savings, including tax savings, (calculated in accordance with GAAP) of approximately $276 million.

As illustrated by the table below, the management fee for each of 2013(1), 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 is significantly lower than the Company’s 2012 compensation expenses (which is represented by the dark gray line):

Management Fee/Compensation Expense(2),(3)

($ in thousands)

(1)

Although the Manager commenced management of Annaly on July 1, 2013, the Company’s stockholders received the benefit of the compensation savings created by the Externalization for the entire 2013 calendar year pursuant to a pro forma adjustment to the 2013 management fee. The Manager calculated a pro forma management fee, which was the management fee as if the Company was managed by the Manager from January 1, 2013 until July 1, 2013, and FIDAC. Mr. Singh was employed by Annalythe actual amount of cash compensation paid to all of Annaly’s employees from January 1, 2013 until July 1, 2013 reduced the amount of the management fee owed to the Manager.

(2)

Assumes compensation costs for each of 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 would have remained what they were in February 2005. From 2001 until he joined Annaly, he was a partner in2012 (the last full year prior to the law firmExternalization).

(3)

Gray shaded area represents compensations savings (exclusive of McKee Nelson LLP. Mr. Singh has a B.A. from Carleton College, a Masters Degree from Columbia University and a J.D. from American University.tax savings).



Table of ContentsANNUAL REVIEW OF MANAGER PERFORMANCE AND MANAGEMENT FEE CONSIDERATIONS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The Compensation Committee annually reviews the Manager’s performance and management fee against both historical results and the Company’s mREIT peers, based on a number of metrics, including those discussed above in the “Proxy Summary” and the expense ratios discussed below.

The Compensation Committee
annually reviews both the
Manager’s performance and
the terms and conditions of the
Management Agreement


40Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Management Structure

Peer Comparison of Operating Expenses as a Percentage of Average Assets and Average Stockholders’ Equity

The Compensation Committee reviews the Company’s total operating expenses (including the management fee), as a percentage of both average assets and average stockholders’ equity, among other metrics. The Compensation Committee believes these ratios, which allow comparison of the Manager’s performance against the Company’s internally- and externally-managed mREIT peers, measure the extent to which the Manager operates in an economically efficient manner.

Operating Expense as a Percentage of Average Assets

201220132014201520162017Average
0.19%     0.22%     0.24%     0.25%     0.25%     0.25%     0.23%
Internally-Managed
Peers
0.54%1.05%0.87%0.72%0.37%0.44%0.67%
Externally-Managed
Peers
0.67%0.63%0.75%0.81%0.74%0.74%0.72%
mREIT Index0.62%0.74%0.77%0.80%0.60%0.62%0.69%

Operating Expense as a Percentage of Average Equity

201220132014201520162017Average
1.45%     1.66%     1.61%     1.58%     1.65%     1.68%     1.61%
Internally-Managed
Peers
2.71%3.95%3.92%3.68%2.14%2.10%3.08%
Externally-Managed
Peers
2.38%3.06%3.55%3.82%4.36%4.00%3.53%
mREIT Index2.33%3.30%3.62%3.80%3.53%3.25%3.30%

Source: Company Filings, SNL and Bloomberg. Averages are market weighted based on market capitalization as of Dec. 31st of each respective year. Note: Internally-Managed Peers and Externally-Managed Peers represent the respective internally- and externally-managed members of the BBREMTG Index as of December 31st of each respective year. The average for each excludes Annaly and companies during years in which they became public or first listed. Operating Expense is defined as: (i) for Internally-Managed Peers, the sum of compensation & benefits, general & administrative expenses and other operating expenses, and (ii) for Externally-Managed Peers and Annaly, the sum of net management fees, compensation & benefits (if any), general & administrative expenses and other operating expenses. Annaly’s 2016 operating expenses exclude costs of $49 million related to the Company’s acquisition of Hatteras Financial Corp.

In its review of these operating expense ratios, the Compensation Committee noted that the Company has outperformed both its internally- and externally-managed mREIT peers over the last six fiscal years. In this regard, the Compensation Committee has viewed the Company’s performance as an indicator that, among other things, the Manager has managed the Company in an efficient manner with appropriately scaled operating costs (including the management fee).

Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement41

The following table sets forth certain information as of March 25, 2015 relating to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by (i) our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer (the “named executive officers”), (ii) each of our Directors, (iii) all of our executive officers and Directors as a group, and (iv) all persons that we know beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock. Knowledge of the beneficial ownership of our common stock is drawn from statements filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 13(d) or 13(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Beneficial Owner(1)    Number(2)    Percent(3)
Wellington J. Denahan2,074,918       *       
Kevin G. Keyes 300,000*
Glenn A. Votek25,000*
Kevin P. Brady127,267*
Jonathan D. Green193,397* 
Michael Haylon102,647*
Donnell A. Segalas194,267 *
E. Wayne Nordberg209,897*
John H. Schaefer58,897*
Francine J. Bovich12,505* 
All executive officers and Directors as a group (11 people)3,797,894*
BlackRock, Inc.(4)69,126,5667.3%
The Vanguard Group, Inc.(5)55,240,8905.8%
*Represents beneficial ownership of less than one percent of the common stock.
                        
(1)The business address of each Director and named executive officer is c/o Annaly Capital Management, Inc., 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036. To the best of our knowledge, each stockholder listed has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by the stockholder.
(2)For purposes of this table, “beneficial ownership” is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, pursuant to which a person or group of persons is deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of any shares of common stock that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of the date of determination. In light of the nature of vested options, we have also included shares of common stock underlying vested options. The shares of common stock underlying vested options included in the above table are as follows: Wellington J. Denahan 700,000 shares; Kevin P. Brady 61,250 shares; Jonathan D. Green 123,750 shares; Michael Haylon 78,750 shares; Donnell A. Segalas 96,250 shares; E. Wayne Nordberg 123,750 shares; and all executive officers and Directors as a group (11 persons) 1,359,750 shares. In addition, we have included deferred stock units, or DSUs, in the above table which are as follows: Kevin P. Brady 21,867 DSUs; Jonathan D. Green 23,897 DSUs; Michael Haylon 23,897 DSUs; Donnell A. Segalas 21,867 DSUs; E. Wayne Nordberg 23,897 DSUs; John H. Schaefer 23,897 DSUs; and Francine J. Bovich 12,505 DSUs.
(3)For purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding shares of common stock held by each person or group of persons named above, any shares which such person or persons has the right to acquire within 60 days, including vested options are deemed to be outstanding but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership.
(4)BlackRock, Inc., 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10022, as a parent holding company or control person of certain named funds (“BlackRock”), filed a Schedule 13G on February 9, 2015 reporting, as of December 31, 2014, beneficially owning 69,126,566 shares of common stock with the sole power to vote or to direct the vote of 63,389,400 shares of common stock, the shared power to vote or to direct the vote of zero shares of common stock, the sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 69,126,566 shares of common stock and the shared power to dispose or to direct the disposition of zero shares of common stock. This information is based solely on information contained in the Schedule 13G filed by Blackrock.
(5)The Vanguard Group, Inc., 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355, as a parent holding company or control person of certain named funds (“Vanguard”), filed a Schedule 13G on February 11, 2015 reporting, as of December 31, 2014, beneficially owning 55,240,890 shares of common stock with the sole power to vote or to direct the vote of 918,401 shares of common stock, the shared power to vote or to direct the vote of zero shares of common stock, the sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 54,420,762 shares of common stock and the shared power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 820,128 shares of common stock. This information is based solely on information contained in the Schedule 13G filed by Vanguard.




Table of Contents

Compensation Paid by the Manager to the Named Executive Officers

NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND COMPENSATION

The NEOs for 2017 are:

NameTitle

Named Executive Officers

Our named executive officers are Wellington J. Denahan, our Co-founder,

Kevin G. KeyesChairman, of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and President
Glenn A. Votek our Chief Financial Officer (CFO). Our named executive officers’
David L. FinkelsteinChief Investment Officer (CIO)
Timothy P. CoffeyChief Credit Officer (CCO)
Anthony C. GreenChief Legal Officer (CLO) and Secretary

INTRODUCTION

As discussed throughout this Proxy Statement, the Company pays the Manager a management fee, the purpose of which is not to provide compensation to the NEOs, but rather to compensate the Manager for the services it provides for the day-to-day management of Annaly. The proceeds of the management fee are used by the Manager in part to pay compensation to the Manager’s personnel, including the NEOs other than Mr. Keyes (who does not receive any compensation for serving as the Company’s CEO, but has an interest in the management fee as an indirect equityholder of the Manager); however, the Company does not determine the compensation payable by the Manager to the NEOs, the Company does not allocate any specific portion of the management fee it pays to the compensation of the NEOs, nor does the Company reimburse the Manager for the cost of such compensation. The Manager makes all decisions relating to compensation it pays to the NEOs based on the factors, including individual and Company performance, it determines to be appropriate and subject to any employment agreements entered into between the Manager and individual NEOs.

DISCLOSURE ENHANCEMENTS

Given that Annaly does not provide any compensation to the NEOs, historically, the Company disclosed information about the management fees it paid to the Manager, but did not disclose information about the Manager’s executive compensation program. However, at the request of the Independent Directors, the Company has engaged in extensive outreach over the last two years in order to understand the information stockholders need to fully evaluate the Manager’s executive compensation program for purposes of the Say-on-Pay vote.

2017 Changes

In response to conversations with stockholders following the 2016 Say-on-Pay vote and conversations with the Manager, the Manager consented to disclosure of certain qualitative information about the Manager’s executive compensation program in the Company’s 2017 Proxy Statement. The Independent Directors also requested that the Manager provide the following information for disclosure in the Company’s 2018 Proxy Statement:

The portion of the management fee that is allocated to NEO compensation is derivedpaid by the Manager;
Of this compensation, the breakdown of fixed vs. variable/incentive pay; and
The metrics the Manager uses to measure performance to determine the NEOs’ variable/incentive pay.

2018 Changes

Following the 2017 Say-on-Pay vote, the Company again engaged in a multi-pronged effort to gather stockholder feedback regarding its 2017 compensation disclosure. While stockholders generally appreciated the qualitative information the Company provided about the Manager’s executive compensation program in the 2017 Proxy Statement, others indicated that they needed specific information about the magnitude of NEO compensation and the proportion of variable NEO pay in order to evaluate the alignment between NEO pay and Company performance. In response to this feedback, the Manager has provided the information below about the compensation it paid to the NEOs for 2017.

42Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Compensation Paid by the Manager to the Named Executive Officers

Summary of 2017 NEO Compensation

With the exception of Mr. Keyes (who does not receive any direct or indirect compensation from the managementManager or the Company for his services as CEO, but does have an interest in the fees we paypaid to the Manager as an equityholder of the parent of the Manager), each of the other NEOs received a base salary and grantsa performance-based cash incentive bonus for 2017.
During 2017, the NEOs as a group received aggregate salaries of awards made by us (if any) directly$2.8 million and aggregate performance-based cash incentive bonuses of $23.9 million from the Manager. These amounts collectively represent 16.2% of the aggregate management fees the Company paid to our namedthe Manager during 2017. On an aggregated basis, the NEOs received 10.3% of their total compensation in the form of base salaries and the remaining 89.7% in the form of performance-based cash incentive bonuses.
In determining the cash bonuses it paid to the NEOs for 2017, the Manager considered achievement of both rigorous Company performance metrics, including core return on equity, core return on assets, and operating expenses as a percentage of average equity, along with individual performance objectives.
The Manager considered a list of specified peer companies (set forth below under “Company Market Data”), together with advice from the Manager’s compensation consultants, to develop appropriate compensation packages for the NEOs.

Components of the NEOs’ Compensation

The Manager’s executive compensation program includes both a base salary and a performance-based cash incentive bonus. Although the Compensation Committee has discretion to grant equity awards of Company common stock to the NEOs (which it has not exercised since the Externalization), the management fee the Company pays to the Manager is paid entirely in cash and therefore the Manager has no independent ability to provide awards of Company stock as part of the NEOs’ compensation. To address this limitation in the Manager’s executive compensation program, the Manager has structured the NEOs’ performance-based cash incentive bonuses with a mix of both rigorous Company performance metrics and individual performance objectives. The table below describes the objectives supported by each of the Manager’s primary compensation elements, along with an overview of the key design features of each element.

Compensation ElementWhat It DoesKey Measures
Base Salary
Provides a level of fixed pay appropriate to an executive’s role and responsibilities
Evaluated on an annual basis, may be adjusted up or down
Experience, duties and scope of responsibility
Internal and external market factors
Performance - Based
Cash Incentive Bonus
Provides a competitive annual cash incentive opportunity
Links executives’ interests with stockholders’ interests
Incentivizes and rewards superior individual and Company performance
Based on achievement of both rigorous Company performance metrics (including core return on equity, core return on assets and operating expenses as percentage of average equity), together with individual performance objectives

NEO Pay Mix

The Manager’s executive compensation program is designed so that the majority of compensation is performance-based and “at-risk” to promote alignment of the NEOs’ interests with those of stockholders. In determining payout of the NEOs’ performance-based cash incentive bonuses (which represents the variable portion of their compensation packages), the Manager considered achievement of both rigorous performance metrics, including core return on equity, core return on assets, and operating expenses as a percentage of average equity, along with individual performance objectives. During 2017, Messrs. Votek, Finkelstein, Coffey, and Green received aggregate performance-based cash incentive bonuses of $23.9 million from the Manager.

Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement43


Table of Contents

Compensation Paid by the Manager to the Named Executive Officers

The base salaries for the NEOs (which represent the fixed portion of their compensation packages) are reviewed annually and may be increased or decreased as the Manager deems appropriate. During 2017, Messrs. Finkelstein, Votek, Coffey and Green received aggregate salaries of $2.8 million from the Manager. On an aggregated basis, Messrs. Votek, Finkelstein, Coffey and Green received 10.3% of their total compensation in the form of base salaries and the remaining 89.7% in the form of performance-based cash incentive bonuses.

2017 NEO Fixed vs. Variable Pay Mix

How the Manager Makes Executive Compensation Decisions

In establishing and reviewing executive compensation packages, the Manager considers the nature and scope of each executive’s role and responsibilities, individual and Company performance, retention considerations and feedback from stakeholders, along with the market data, analyses and recommendations provided by external compensation consultants (as further described below under “Role of the Manager’s Compensation Consultants” and “Market Compensation Data”).

Role of the Manager’s Compensation Consultants

During 2017, the Manager retained Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC, FPL Associates, L.P. and Richter Associates, Inc. for advice and perspectives regarding market trends that may impact decisions about the Manager’s executive compensation program and practices.

Company Market Data

The Manager considers compensation data and practices of a group of peer companies (the “Peer Group”), as well as current market trends and practices generally, in developing appropriate compensation packages for the NEOs.

In determining the Peer Group, the Manager considers both industry and company-specific dynamics to identify the peers with which the Company competes for assets, stockholders and talent. As a result, the Manager focuses on peers within the mREIT industry, as well as asset management companies that manage mREITs, along with other asset managers and financial companies within relevant market capitalization and/or revenue bands. The Manager annually reviews the Peer Group and may update its composition to better reflect the Company’s competitive landscape or, if necessary, to account for corporate changes, including acquisitions and dispositions.

The Manager considers
both industry and company-
specific dynamics to identify
the peers with which the
Company competes for assets,
stockholders and talent

COMPENSATION PEER GROUP

Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.Fortress Investment Group LLCNorthern Trust Corporation
AGNC Investment Corp.Franklin Resources, Inc.Raymond James Financial, Inc.
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.Invesco Ltd.Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
Ares Capital CorporationKKR & Co. L.P.T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
Ares Management, L.P.Lazard LtdTD Ameritrade Holding Corporation
ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc.Legg Mason, Inc.The Blackstone Group L.P.
E*TRADE Financial CorporationLeucadia National CorporationThe Carlyle Group L.P.
Eaton Vance Corp.New Residential Investment Corp.Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc.

44Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

PROPOSAL
02
Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation

The Board is committed to corporate governance best practices and recognizes the significant interest of stockholders in executive officerscompensation matters. The Company is providing this non-binding advisory vote pursuant to our equity incentive plan.Section 14A of the Exchange Act.

As described in detail under the headings “Management Structure” and “Compensation Paid by the Manager to the Named Executive Officers” above and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis

We are externally managed” below, the Company is externally-managed by the Manager. We payManager pursuant to the Management Agreement between the Manager and the Company. The Manager is responsible for paying all compensation expense associated with managing the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company pays the Manager a management fee, of 1.05% of our stockholders’ equity (as definedand the Manager uses the proceeds from the management fee to pay compensation to the Manager’s personnel, including the NEOs other than Mr. Keyes (who does not receive any compensation for serving as the Company’s CEO, but has an interest in the management agreement), andfee as an indirect equityholder of the Manager); however, the Company does not determine the compensation payable by the Manager pays allto the NEOs, the Company does not allocate any specific portion of the management fee it pays to the compensation of the NEOs, nor does it reimburse the Manager for the cost of such compensation. The Manager makes all decisions relating to the compensation of the NEOs based on the factors the Manager determines to be appropriate, including both individual and Company performance, and subject to the terms of any employment agreement entered into between the Manager and an individual NEO.

The NEOs are eligible to receive equity awards pursuant to the Company’s equity incentive plan, which is administered by the Compensation Committee. No equity awards were made to any of the NEOs in 2017. In 2017, the Company did not pay any compensation to ourthe NEOs.

The Board recommends that the stockholders vote in favor of the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and related narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”

While this vote is advisory and non-binding, the Manager’s employees. While some of our employees (but none of our executive officers) remain employed by our subsidiaries for regulatory or corporate efficiency reasons, all compensation expenses paid to such personnel by our subsidiaries reduceBoard and Compensation Committee value the management fee we pay to the Manager. We do not pay the Manager any incentive fee based on the achievement of return thresholds. If we experience realized losses, the measurement of our stockholders’ equity decreases, and, therefore, the management fee also decreases. As a result, we believe that the Manager is incentivized to ensure that our long-term performance protects our stockholders’ equity. In addition, any additional equity offerings by us, which would increase stockholders’ equity and the management fee, must be approved by our Board of Directors. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” for a discussionviews of the fees paid to the Manager.

Risks Related to Compensation PoliciesCompany’s stockholders and Practices

Our Board of Directors reviewed with our Compensation Committee its compensation policies and practices applicable to the fees we pay our Manager under our management agreement or any grants of equity awards that could affect our assessment of risk and risk management. Following such review, we determined that our fee arrangement with our Manager and any grants of equity awards by our Compensation Committee do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. As part of this risk assessment and management activities going forward, our Board of Directors also determined that it would undertake an annual review of our compensation policies and practices as they relate to risk.

Consideration of “Say-on-Pay” and “Say on Frequency” Voting Results

At our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders, we submitted our advisory vote on the fiscal year 2013 compensation of our named executive officers (commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” vote) for the consideration of our stockholders. The compensation of our named executive officers received support from approximately 91% of the votes cast on the Say-on-Pay proposal. Our Compensation Committee considered the results of the Say-on-Pay proposal in its review of our executive officers and the management fees we paid in 2014. We and the Compensation Committee believe that the management fee we pay compares favorably to that of our peers.

The Compensation Committee and the rest of our Board of Directors will continue to consider the outcome of future Say-on-Pay votes, as well as feedback received throughout the year,voting results when making compensation decisions for our named executive officers, including any plan-based awards under ourregarding the Company’s equity incentive plan and plans.

The Board recommends a voteFORthe management fees we pay to our Manager.Approval of this Resolution.



COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

As discussed above, the Manager pays all of the compensation, including benefits, to its employees (including the NEOs other than Mr. Keyes). Although certain personnel (but none of the NEOs) are employed by the Company’s subsidiaries for regulatory or corporate efficiency reasons, all compensation and benefits paid to such personnel by the Company’s subsidiaries reduce, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, the management fee the Company pays to the Manager. The proceeds of the management fee are used in part to pay compensation to the Manager’s personnel, including the NEOs other than Mr. Keyes (who does not receive any compensation for serving as the Company’s CEO, but has an interest in the management fee as an indirect equityholder of the Manager); however, the Company does not determine the compensation payable by the Manager to the NEOs, the Company does not allocate any specific portion of the management fee it pays to the compensation of the NEOs, nor does it reimburse the Manager for the cost of such compensation.

Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy StatementTable of Contents45

Compensation Committee Report



Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Accordingly, the Company did not pay any cash compensation to the NEOs, nor did the Company grant them any plan-based awards, for 2017. The Company does not provide the NEOs with pension benefits, perquisites or other personal benefits. The Company is not party to any employment agreements entered into between the Manager and individual NEOs, and it does not have any arrangements to pay such individuals any cash severance upon their termination or a change in control of the Company. As a result, no compensation is includable in the Summary Compensation Table for the NEOs.

Pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement, the Company pays the Manager a monthly management fee equal to 1/12th of 1.05% of the Company’s stockholders’ equity, as defined in the Management Agreement, for its management services, which was approximately $164.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017.

The Manager, which is a private company that is not subject to the disclosure requirements of the SEC, has sole discretion to determine the compensation it pays to its employees, including the NEOs. The Manager makes all compensation determinations for its employees without any direction by the Board and without reference to any specific policies or programs under the oversight of the Board. The Manager compensates its employees (including the NEOs) for a variety of services performed for the benefit of the Manager. Thus, the compensation paid by the Manager to its employees who are serving as the Company’s NEOs is not considered to be part of the Company’s executive compensation program.

Consideration of “Say-on-Pay” Voting Results

At the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting, 69% of the votes cast supported the Company’s Say-on-Pay vote. While the Say-on-Pay vote received majority support, the Compensation Committee was disappointed with the percentage of votes cast against the proposal and the Company redoubled its engagement efforts in order to understand the information stockholders need to evaluate the alignment between NEO pay and Company performance. These efforts included:

Outreach to investors representing approximately 72% of shares held by institutional stockholders, including 92% of the companyCompany’s 50 largest stockholders and 96% of the Company’s 25 largest stockholders

Analysis of market practices at peer companies

Advice from compensation consultants

Attendance at investor conferences

Discussions with proxy advisory services and corporate governance research firms


During the course of this review, the Company identified that certain stockholders and other key stakeholders would like the Company to disclose the magnitude of NEO compensation and the proportion of variable NEO pay to facilitate an informed evaluation of the Manager’s executive compensation program. In orderto address these concerns, the Manager has provided the Company with detailed quantitative information about its executive compensation program for inclusion in this Proxy Statement. For additional details, please see “Compensation Paid by the Manager to the Named Executive Officers – 2018 Changes” above.

The Company reached out to
92% of its 50 largest stockholders

The Company and the Board will continue to consider the outcome of future Say-on-Pay votes, as well as stockholder feedback received throughout the year, and invite stockholders to express their views to the Independent Directors as described under “Communications with the Board.”

46Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION POLICIES

Stock Ownership Guidelines/Commitments

Position   Number of
Individuals
   Annaly Stock Ownership
Guideline/Commitment
   Timeframe to Meet
Guideline/Commitment
Chief Executive Officer(1)1$15,000,000July 2020
Other Operating Committee Members(2)930% of Annual Total Compensation5 years
Managing Directors2320% of Annual Total Compensation5 years
Director-Level Employees2810% of Annual Total Compensation5 years
Total61
(1)

In July 2017, Mr. Keyes voluntarily committed to increase his stock ownership position beyond his Board-approved ownership guideline of $10 million. Mr. Keyes has pledged to meet his enhanced $15 million commitment solely through additional open market purchases of the Company’s common stock.

(2)

In July 2017, other members of senior management (including the CIO, CCO, CFO and CLO) voluntarily committed to increase their stock ownership positions beyond the guideline of 30% of annual total compensation adopted by the Board. Like Mr. Keyes, these officers have agreed to achieve their increased stock ownership commitments by July 2020 solely through open market purchases of the Company’s common stock.


These stock ownership guidelines apply to more than 40% of the Manager’s employees. As of March 31, 2017, all such individuals either met or, within the applicable period, are expected to meet the stock ownership guidelines.

Stock Holding Period

Under a policy adopted by the Compensation Committee in 2016, theManager’s employees (including the executive officers) are required to hold for a period of four years the net after-tax shares of Company stock they receive through stock option exercises or vesting of equity incentive awards.

The NEOs voluntarily
committed to increase their
NLY positions beyond the
amounts stated under their
ownership guidelines

Prohibition on Hedging Company Securities

The Company has a policy prohibiting the Manager’s employees (including the executive officers) from engaging in any hedging transactions with respect to Company securities held by them, which includes the purchase of any financial instrument (including forward contracts and zero cost collars) designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Company securities.

Prohibition on Pledging Company Securities

The Company has a policy prohibiting the Manager’s employees (including the executive officers) from holding Company securities in a margin account or pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan.

Risks Related to Compensation Policies and Practices

As discussed above in “Management Structure,” the Compensation Committee is not entitled to approve compensation decisions made by the Manager and the Manager does not consult with the Compensation Committee prior to making any such decisions. Therefore, the Compensation Committee has no compensation policies or practices applicable to, or decision-making role regarding, the manner in which the Manager uses the management fee to cover its operating expenses, including employee compensation. However, in connection with the Compensation Committee’s administration of the Company’s equity incentive plan, the Committee conducts an annual risk assessment of the Company’s compensation policies and practices applicable to such plan. In 2017, the Compensation Committee determined that these compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement47


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee of the Company has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

Donnell A. Segalas (Chair)John H. SchaeferJonathan D. Green
Donnell A. Segalas (Chair)Jonathan D. GreenE. Wayne NordbergJohn H. SchaeferVicki Williams

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

Summary Compensation Table

The Company did not pay any compensation to the NEOs with respect to the years ended December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016 or December 31, 2015.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The Company did not grant the NEOs any plan based awards in 2017.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

None of the NEOs had outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2017.

Options Exercised and Stock Vested

No options were exercised and no stock vested for the NEOs during 2017.

The Company did not pay any
cash or equity compensation to
the NEOs for 2017. The Company
does not provide them with
pension benefits, perquisites or
other personal benefits.

Summary Compensation Table

The table below sets forth the aggregate compensation we paid or accrued with respect to the three year period ended December 31, 2014, to our named executive officers.

All Other
Name and Principal Position(1)Year    Salary    Bonus    Compensation    Total
Wellington J. Denahan2014 $-$-       $-       $-
       Chairman and2013 $1,500,000$- $5,148$1,505,148
              Chief Executive Officer2012$3,000,000 $22,800,000 $10,129 $25,810,129
Glenn A. Votek2014$-$-$-$-
       Chief Financial Officer2013$91,346$-$48$91,394

(1)Amounts for 2012 and 2013 reflect compensation that we paid to our named executive officers prior to us becoming externally managed by the Manager. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

We did not grant our named executive officers any plan based awards in 2014. We describe our equity incentive plan in “Equity Compensation Plan Information” below.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table provides information about outstanding equity awards of our named executive officers as December 31, 2014.

Equity Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of SecuritiesNumber of SecuritiesNumber of Securities
UnderlyingUnderlyingUnderlyingOptionOption
Unexercised OptionsUnexercised OptionsUnexercisedExerciseExpiration
NameExercisable(#)(1)Unexercisable(#)Unearned Options(#)Price($)Date
Wellington J. Denahan150,000    -    -    $17.07    7/7/15
150,000--$15.70 5/17/17
200,000--$16.465/8/18
200,000--$15.619/19/18
Glenn A. Votek-----

(1)All options listed above vested beginning on the first anniversary of date of grant at a rate of 25% per year over the first four years of the ten-year option term.


Table of Contents

Options Exercised and Stock Vested

No options were exercised and no stock vested for our named executive officers during the calendar year 2014.

Pension Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

We doThe Company does not provide our named executive officersthe NEOs with any benefits pursuant to defined benefit plans and nonqualified deferred compensation plans.

Potential Payments Uponupon Termination or Change in Control

We areThe Company is not responsible for any amounts payable or any additional vesting of outstanding equity awards for any termination of service by any of our named executive officers.the NEOs. No amounts would have been payable by usthe Company to any of the named executive officersNEOs upon a change in control as of December 31, 2014.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

On May 27, 2010, at our 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders approved the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. The 2010 Equity Incentive Plan authorizes the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors to grant options, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalent rights, or other share-based awards, including restricted shares up to an aggregate of 25,000,000 shares, subject to adjustments as provided in the equity incentive plan. All stock options issued under the equity incentive plan and our prior incentive plan were issued at the current market price on the date of grant, subject to an immediate or four year vesting in four equal installments with a contractual term of 5 or 10 years. The grant date fair value is calculated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model.

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2014 concerning shares of our common stock authorized for issuance under our incentive plans.

Weighted-averageNumber of securities
Number of securities toexercise price ofremaining available
be issued uponoutstandingfor future issuance
exercise ofoptions,under Plan
outstanding options,warrants and(excluding
Plan Categorywarrants and rightsrightspreviously issued)
Equity compensation plans approved by security   2,259,335   $15.35   28,156,221
       holders 
Equity compensation plans not approved by---
       security holders
Total2,259,335$15.3528,156,221



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

We compensate our independent Directors. Any member of our Board of Directors who is also an employee of our Manager does not receive compensation for serving on our Board of Directors.

During 2014, our Compensation Committee retained Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., a nationally-recognized compensation consulting firm (“F. W. Cook”), to assist the Compensation Committee in its review of the components of the compensation arrangements offered to our independent Directors. As part of this process, our Compensation Committee considered, among other things, the duties and responsibilities associated with their positions and emerging trends and best practices in Director compensation.

Based upon the recommendations of F. W. Cook and our Compensation Committee’s review of F. W. Cook’s analysis, our Compensation Committee determined to leave unchanged the compensation we pay our independent Directors. Subsequently, with the creation of the lead independent Director position, our independent Directors determined that the lead independent Director should receive additional annual compensation for his or her service in such position. The current independent Director compensation is as follows:

$100,000 annual fee, which fee is payable in cash;
an annual fee for the lead independent Director of $10,000 for his or her service in suchcapacity, which fee is payable in cash;
an annual fee for the chair of our Audit Committee of $15,000 for his or her service in suchcapacity, which fee is payable in cash;
an annual fee of $10,000, which fee is payable in cash, to the chairs of each of ourCompensation Committee, Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, and RiskCommittee for his or her service in such capacity;
a fee of $1,500 for each meeting of any committee (but not full Board) attended by anindependent Director; and
an annual grant to of $135,000 in deferred stock units (“DSUs”). Each DSU is equivalent invalue to one share of our common stock. DSUs will be granted on the date of the annualstockholders meeting and vest immediately. DSUs will be converted to shares of ourcommon stock one year after the date of grant unless the Director elects to defer thesettlement of the DSUs to a later date. DSUs do not have voting rights. DSUs pay dividendequivalents in either cash or additional DSUs at the election of the Director.

We also reimburse our Directors for their travel expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at full Board and committee meetings. Our independent Directors are also eligible to receive restricted common stock, option and other stock-based awards under our equity incentive plan.

The Compensation Committee will, on an ongoing basis, continue to examine and assess our Director compensation practices relative to our compensation philosophy and objectives, as well as competitive market practices and total stockholder returns, and will make modifications to the compensation programs, as deemed appropriate.

Director Stock Ownership Guideline

We have adopted a stock ownership guideline for our independent Directors that specifies that each independent Director should strive to own an amount of our common stock which is three times their annual cash retainer. Shares counting toward the guideline include shares that are owned outright,



Table of Contents

DSUs, and any other shares held in deferral accounts. To facilitate achievement of the guideline, we have adopted and implemented a “retention ratio” that requires that until the specified ownership level is achieved, independent Directors are required to retain and hold 50% of the net profit shares from DSUs. Net profit shares are shares remaining after payment of income taxes upon settlement of the DSUs. The independent Directors are not required to make out-of-pocket purchases of stock to achieve the guideline; rather, the existing Director equity compensation program would enable them to achieve the required ownership levels over time.2017.

Director CompensationCOMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

The table below summarizes the compensation paid by us to our independent Directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

NameFees Earned or Paid in Cash($)DSU Awards($)Total($)
Kevin P. Brady$130,000    $135,000    $265,000
Jonathan D. Green$126,500$135,000$261,500
Michael Haylon$112,000$135,000$247,000
John A. Lambiase(1)$50,000-$50,000
E. Wayne Nordberg$117,500$135,000 $252,500
Donnell A. Segalas$117,500$135,000$252,500
John H. Schaefer$116,500$135,000$251,500
Francine J. Bovich(2)    $66,667$135,000$201,667
(1)Mr. John Lambiase did not stand for reelection at our 2014 annual meeting and ceased serving on the Board of Directors following our May 2014 annual meeting.
(2)Ms. Francine Bovich was elected to serve as a Board member at our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders. Annual compensation is pro-rated based on service period.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

Our Compensation Committee is comprised solely of the following independentIndependent Directors: Messrs. Segalas (Chair), Green, Nordberg and Schaefer and Nordberg.Ms. Williams. None of them is serving or has served as an officer or employee of usthe Company or any affiliate or has any other business relationship or affiliation with us,the Company, except his service as a Director, and there are no other Compensation Committee interlocks that are required to be reported under the rules and regulations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.Act.



CEO PAY RATIO

Effective July 1, 2013, all of the Company’s employees were terminated by the Company and were hired by the Manager. However, a limited number of employees remain as employees of the Company’s subsidiaries for regulatory or corporate efficiency reasons. All compensation and benefits paid to such personnel by the Company’s subsidiaries reduce, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, the management fee the Company pays to the Manager. At December 31, 2017, the Company’s measurement date for identifying the median employee, the Company’s subsidiaries had six full-time employees (and no part-time employees). The Company chose total compensation in accordance with the requirements of the Summary Compensation Table as its consistently applied compensation measure to identify the median employee. The Company’s median employee compensation as calculated using the Summary Compensation Table requirements was $229,408 in 2017. The Company does not provide any compensation to the CEO. As a result, the CEO to median employee pay ratio is not applicable.

This information is being provided for compliance purposes. Neither the Compensation Committee nor management of Contentsthe Company used the pay ratio measure in making compensation decisions.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS48Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Management AgreementTable of Contents

We have entered into a management agreement with the ManagerAudit Committee Matters

PROPOSAL
03
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young” or “E&Y”) to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018, and stockholders are being asked to ratify the selection at the Annual Meeting as a matter of good corporate governance. Ernst & Young has served as Annaly’s independent registered public accounting firm since 2012. In appointing Ernst & Young, the Audit Committee considered a number of factors, including Ernst & Young’s independence, objectivity, level of service, industry knowledge, technical expertise, and tenure as the independent auditor. The Company expects that representatives of Ernst & Young will be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. If the appointment of Ernst & Young is not ratified, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, appoint a different independent auditor at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in the stockholders best interest.

The Board recommends a voteFORthe ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the year 2018.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a charter which our management is conducted by the Manager through the authority delegated to it in the management agreementreviews annually, and pursuant to the policies established by our Board of Directors. The management agreement was effective as of July 1, 2013 and was amended on November 5, 2014.

Pursuant to the termsa brief description of the management agreement, we pay the Manager a monthly management fee equal to 1/12th of 1.05% of our stockholders’ equity, as defined in the management agreement, for its management services. We incurred approximately $156 million in management feesAudit Committee’s primary responsibilities is included under the management agreement duringheading “Board Committees – Audit Committee” in this Proxy Statement. Under the year ended December 31, 2014.

TheAudit Committee’s charter, management agreement provides for a two year term ending December 31, 2016 with automatic two-year renewals unless at least two-thirds of our independent Directors or the holders of a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock elect to terminate the agreement in their sole discretion and for any or no reason. At any time during the term or any renewal term we may deliver to the Manager written notice of our intention to terminate the management agreement. We must designate a date not less than one year from the date of the notice on which the management agreement will terminate. The Manager may terminate the management agreement by providing to us prior written notice of its intention to terminate the management agreement no less than one year prior to the date designated by the Manager on which the Manager would cease to provide services or such earlier date as determined by us in our sole discretion.

The management agreement may be amended or modified by agreement between us and the Manager. There is no termination fee for a termination of the management agreement by either us or the Manager.

The Manager

The Manager is Annaly Management Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. The Manager is owned by our management. Our Manager is responsible for paying all compensation expense associated with managing us and our subsidiaries. We pay our Manager a management fee and our Manager uses the proceeds from the management fee to pay compensation to its officers and personnel, including our executive officers.

Employment of Related Persons

Matthew J. Lambiase is the son of our former Director, John A. Lambiase, and is employed by FIDAC as a Managing Director. Mr. John Lambiase did not stand for reelection at our 2014 annual meeting and ceased serving on the Board of Directors following the 2014 annual meeting in May 2014. Mr. Matthew J. Lambiase is not an executive officer. Alexandra Denahan is the sister of Wellington J. Denahan, our Chairmanpreparation of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, and was employed by FIDAC as a Managing Director until April 2014. Ms. Alexandra Denahan was not an executive officer. The compensation paid by our subsidiaries to these individuals reduced the management fee we paid to our Manager on a dollar for dollar basis. As a result, our Manager effectively paid their compensation.

Approval of Related Person Transactions

Each of our Directors, Director nominees and executive officers is required to complete an annual disclosure questionnaire and report all transactions with us in which they and their immediate family members had or will have a direct or indirect material interest with respect to us. We review these questionnaires and, if we determine it to be necessary, discuss any reported transactions with the entire



Table of Contents

Board of Directors. We do not, however, have a formal written policy for approval or ratification of such transactions, and all such transactions are evaluated on a case-by-case basis. If we believe a transaction is significant to us and raises particular conflict of interest issues, we will discuss it with our legal counsel, and if necessary, we will form an independent Board committee which has the right to engage its own legal and financial counsel to evaluate and approve the transaction.



Table of Contents

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

Since our inception, we have had an Audit Committee composed entirely of independent Directors. The members of the Audit Committee meet the independence and experience requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Brady is the Audit Committee financial expert and is an independent Director within the meaning of the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange. In 2014, the Committee met five times. The Audit Committee has adopted a written charter outlining the practices it follows. A full text of our Audit Committee charter is available for viewing on our website atwww.annaly.com. Any changes in the charter or key practices will be reflected on our website.

In performing all of its functions, the Audit Committee acts only in an oversight capacity and, necessarily, in its oversight role, the Audit Committee relies on the work and assurances of our management, which has the primary responsibility forCompany’s financial statements and reports, and of the independent registered public accounting firm who, inis responsible for auditing those financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their report, expressconformity with U.S.generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, the independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing and expressing an opinion on the conformity of our annual financial statements to generally accepted accounting principles and on the effectiveness of ourCompany’s internal controlcontrols over financial reporting as of year-end.reporting.

The Audit Committee
is responsible for the
appointment, compensation,
retention and oversight of the
independent auditors

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed ourAnnaly’s audited financial statements with management and with Ernst & Young, LLP, ourthe Company’s independent auditorsauditor for 2014.2017.

The Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61.

The Audit Committee has received fromapplicable standards adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, including matters concerning Ernst & Young LLP the written statements required by PCAOB Rule No. 3526, “Communications with Audit Committees Concerning Independence,” and has discussed Ernst & Young LLP’s independence with Ernst & Young LLP, and has considered the compatibility of non-audit services with the auditor’sYoung’s independence.

In reliance on these reviews and discussions, and the report of the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee has recommended to ourthe Board, of Directors, and ourthe Board of Directors has approved, that the audited financial statements be included in ourthe Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 for filing2017 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee also recommends the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as independent public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2015.SEC.

The foregoing report has been furnished by the Audit Committee:

Kevin P. Brady (Chair)Jonathan D. GreenMichael HaylonE. Wayne NordbergJohn H. Schaefer



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 2
APPROVAL OF A NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE
APPROVING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONVicki Williams

Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement49


Our Board of Directors is committed to corporate governance best practices and recognizes the significant interest of stockholders in executive compensation matters. We are providing this advisory vote as required pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act. The stockholder vote will not be binding on us or the Board of Directors, and it will not be construed as overruling any decision by us or the Board of Directors or creating or implying any change to, or additional, fiduciary duties for us or the Board of Directors.

As described in detail under the heading “Executive Officers and Compensation” above, we are externally managed by our Manager pursuant to the management agreement between our Manager and us. While this vote is advisory and not binding on us, it will provide information to us and the Compensation and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees regarding shareholder sentiment about our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices, which the compensation and governance committee will be able to consider when determining whether the management fee payable pursuant to the management agreement is appropriate. Our Manager is responsible for paying all compensation expense associated with managing us and our subsidiaries. We pay our Manager a management fee and our Manager uses the proceeds from the management fee to pay compensation to its officers and personnel, including our executive officers. Our Manager makes all decisions relating to the compensation of our officers and personnel, including our executive officers, based on such factors as our Manager may determine are appropriate. In addition, our named executive officers are eligible for equity awards pursuant to our equity incentive plan administered by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. No equity awards were made to any of our named executive officers in 2014.

For these reasons, the Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote in favor of the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THIS RESOLUTION.



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Our Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP, or Ernst & Young, to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015, and shareholders are asked to ratify the selection at the Annual Meeting. We expect that representatives of Ernst & Young will be present at the annual meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. If the appointment of Ernst & Young is not ratified, our Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment.Matters

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OURRELATIONSHIP WITH INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEAR 2015.

Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

In addition to performing the audits of our financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting, Ernst & Young and its affiliated entities, or E&Y, provided audit-related services for us during 2014 and 2013. The aggregate fees billed for 2014 by E&Y2017 and 20132016 by E&Y for each of the following categories of services are set forth below:

Audit Fees: The aggregate fees billed by E&Y for audit and reviews of our 2014 financial statements were $1,403,500. The aggregate fees billed by E&Y for audit and reviews of our 2013 financial statements were $1,275,000.

Audit-Related Fees: The aggregate fees billed by E&Y for audit related services during 2014 were $232,300. The aggregate fees billed by E&Y for audit-related services during 2013 were $216,205. The audit-related services in 2014 and 2013 principally included due diligence and accounting consultation.

Tax Fees: The aggregate fees billed by E&Y for tax services for 2014 were $96,070. The aggregate fees billed by E&Y for tax services for 2013 were $90,500.

All Other Fees: The aggregate fees billed by E&Y for all other services for 2014 were $98,000. The aggregate fees billed by E&Y for all other services for 2013 were $72,125 and principally included consulting services.
Service Category     2017     2016
Audit(1) $2,498,876 $2,416,392
Audit-Related(2)61,00030,000
Tax(3)232,000239,900
All Other(4)
Total$2,791,876$2,686,292
(1)

Audit fees primarily relate to integrated audits of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting under Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404, reviews of the Company’s quarterly consolidated financial statements, audits of the Company’s subsidiaries’ financial statements and comfort letters and consents related to SEC registration statements.

(2)

Audit-Related fees are primarily for assurance and related services that are traditionally performed by the independent registered public accounting firm and include due diligence and accounting consultations.

(3)

Tax fees are primarily for preparation of tax returns and compliance services and tax consultations.

(4)

All Other fees are for those services not described in one of the other categories.

The Audit Committee has also adopted policies and procedures for pre-approving all non-audit work performed by ourthe independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee retained E&Y to provide certain non-audit services in 2017, all of which were pre-approved by the Audit Committee. Specifically, the Audit Committee pre-approved the use of E&Y for the following categories of non-audit services: SEC filings,

accounting consultations on matters addressed during the audit or interim reviews
agreed upon procedures in connection with financing arrangements of certain Company subsidiaries
tax compliance and consultations

The Audit Committee determined that the provision by E&Y of these non-audit services is compatible with E&Y maintaining its independence.

In addition to the non-audit services described above, the Audit Committee also pre-approved certain audit services, including comfort letters and consents related to SEC registration statements and review of SEC comment letters; accounting consultations on matters addressed duringletters.

The Audit Committee requires
the lead audit partner to be
rotated every five years and is
involved in selecting each new
lead audit partner


The Company understands the need for E&Y to maintain objectivity and independence as the auditor of its financial statements and internal control over financial reporting. In accordance with SEC rules, the Audit Committee requires the lead E&Y partner assigned to Annaly’s audit or interim reviews; review, includingto be rotated at least every five years, and the issuance of a comfort letter, relating to commercial asset securitizations;Audit Committee and tax compliance and consultations. Ourits chair is involved in selecting each new lead audit partner. The Audit Committee approved the hiring of E&Y to provide all of the services detailed above prior to such independent registered public accounting firm’s engagement. None of the services related to theAudit-Related Feesdescribed above was approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to a waiver of pre-approval provisions set forth in applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.



Table of Contents

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE50Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Stock Ownership Information

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information as of March 26, 2018 relating to the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock by (i) each NEO, (ii) each Director and nominee for Director, (iii) all executive officers and Directors as a group, and (iv) all persons that the Company knows beneficially own more than 5% of its outstanding common stock. Knowledge of the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock is drawn from statements filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 13(d) or 13(g) of the Exchange Act.

Beneficial Owner(1)               Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership(2)
               Percent of
Class(3)
Kevin G. Keyes984,779*
Glenn A. Votek93,597*
David L. Finkelstein300,000*
Timothy P. Coffey38,000*
Anthony C. Green101,000*
Kevin P. Brady(4)260,836*
Francine J. Bovich76,574*
Wellington J. Denahan2,198,414*
Katie Beirne Fallon(5)*
Jonathan D. Green214,778*
Michael Haylon154,028*
E. Wayne Nordberg(6)231,278*
John H. Schaefer108,679*
Donnell A. Segalas(7)259,386*
Vicki Williams(5)*
All executive officers and Directors as a group (15 people)5,021,349*
BlackRock, Inc.(8)98,137,0618.5%
The Vanguard Group, Inc.(9)97,590,3028.4%
*

Represents beneficial ownership of less than one percent of the common stock.

(1)

The business address of each Director and NEO is c/o Annaly Capital Management, Inc., 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036. To the best of the Company’s knowledge, each stockholder listed has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by the stockholder.

(2)

For purposes of this table, “beneficial ownership” is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, pursuant to which a person or group of persons is deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of any shares of common stock that such person, or such group of persons, has the right to acquire within 60 days of the date of determination. The Company has also included shares of common stock underlying vested options. The shares of common stock underlying vested options included in the above table are as follows: Kevin P. Brady 42,500 shares; Wellington J. Denahan 400,000 shares; Jonathan D. Green 90,000 shares; Michael Haylon 75,000 shares; E. Wayne Nordberg 90,000 shares; and Donnell A. Segalas 77,500 shares. The DSUs included in the above table are as follows: Kevin P. Brady 72,436 DSUs; Francine J. Bovich 63,074 DSUs; Jonathan D. Green 79,028 DSUs; Michael Haylon 79,028 DSUs; E. Wayne Nordberg 79,028 DSUs; John H. Schaefer 42,636 DSUs; and Donnell A. Segalas 72,436 DSUs.

(3)

For purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding shares of common stock held by each person or group of persons named above, any shares which such person or group of persons has the right to acquire within 60 days, including vested options and DSUs, are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding shares of the class owned by such person or group of persons, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding shares owned by any other person or group of persons.

(4)

Includes: (i) 48,750 shares owned by the Kevin P. Brady Family Trust, (ii) 42,500 shares owned by Mr. Brady’s wife, (iii) 1,500 shares owned by Mr. Brady’s daughters, and (iv) 9,000 shares owned by Mr. Brady’s mother. Mr. Brady disclaims beneficial ownership of these 101,750 shares.

(5)

Appointed to the Board effective January 1, 2018.

(6)

Includes: (i) 10,000 shares owned by the Olivia Nordberg Trust and (ii) 9,000 shares owned by Mr. Nordberg’s spouse.

(7)

Includes: (i) 3,000 shares owned by the Hercules Segalas Irrevocable Trust, (ii) 900 shares owned by Mr. Segalas’s daughters, and (iii) 2,100 shares owned by the Katherine Lacy Segalas Devlin Irrevocable Trust. Mr. Segalas disclaims beneficial ownership of these 6,000 shares.


Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement51


We believeTable of Contents

Stock Ownership Information

(8)

BlackRock, Inc., 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055, as a parent holding company or control person of certain named funds (“BlackRock”), filed a Schedule 13G/A on January 29, 2018 reporting, as of December 31, 2017, beneficially owning 98,137,061 shares of common stock with the sole power to vote or to direct the vote of 88,472,142 shares of common stock and the sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 98,137,061 shares of common stock. This information is based solely on information contained in the Schedule 13G/A filed by Blackrock.

(9)

The Vanguard Group, Inc., 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355, as a parent holding company or control person of certain named funds (“Vanguard”), filed a Schedule 13G/A on February 12, 2018 reporting, as of December 31, 2017, beneficially owning 97,590,302 shares of common stock with the sole power to vote or to direct the vote of 934,888 shares of common stock, the shared power to vote or to direct the vote of 470,621 shares of common stock, the sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 96,290,492 shares of common stock and the shared power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 1,299,810 shares of common stock. This information is based solely on information contained in the Schedule 13G/A filed by Vanguard.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

The Company believes that based solely upon ouron its review of copies of forms we have received or written representations from reporting persons,the reports filed during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014,2017 and on the written representations of those filing reports, all filing requirements under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, applicableforms required to ourbe filed by Annaly’s executive officers, Directors and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of ourits common stock were complied withfiled on a timely basis. The company filesbasis and in compliance with Section 16(a) of the required reports on behalf of its executive officers and Directors.Exchange Act.

ACCESS TO FORM 10-K52Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Other Information

ACCESS TO FORM 10-K

On written request, wethe Company will provide without charge to each record or beneficial holder of ourthe Company’s common stock as of the close of business on March 27, 201526, 2018 (the “Record Date”) a copy of our annual reportthe Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014,2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC. You should address your request to Investor Relations, Annaly Capital Management, Inc., 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New YorkNY 10036 or email your request to us at investor@annaly.com.

We makeYou may also access such report on Annaly’s website,www.annaly.com, under “Investors - SEC Filings.”

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Any stockholder intending to propose a matter for consideration at the Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting and have the proposal included in the proxy statement and form of proxy for such meeting must, in addition to complying with the applicable laws and regulations governing submissions of such proposals (Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act), submit the proposal in writing no later than December 11, 2018.

Pursuant to the Company’s current Amended and Restated Bylaws (“Bylaws”), any stockholder intending to nominate a Director or present a proposal at an annual meeting of stockholders that is not intended to be included in the Proxy Statement for such annual meeting must provide written notification not later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the date that is 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting nor earlier than 150 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the Proxy Statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting. Accordingly, any stockholder who intends to submit such a nomination or such a proposal at the 2019 Annual Meeting must provide written notification of such proposal by December 11, 2018, but in no event earlier than November 11, 2018.

Any such nomination or proposal should be sent to Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, Annaly Capital Management, Inc., 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036 and, to the extent applicable, must include the information required by the Company’s Bylaws.

OTHER MATTERS

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board does not know of any matter that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than as described in this Proxy Statement.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

 Q When and where is the Annual Meeting?
 A The Annual Meeting will be held on May 23, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NLY2018. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting online, you will need the 16-digit control number included in your Notice, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompany your proxy materials.
 Q Why did I receive a Notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a paper copy of proxy materials?
 A The SEC has approved “Notice and Access” rules relating to the delivery of proxy materials over the Internet. These rules permit the Company to furnish proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report, to stockholders by providing access to such documents on the Internet instead of mailing printed copies. Most stockholders will not receive paper copies of the proxy materials unless they request them. Instead, the Notice, which will be mailed to stockholders, provides instructions regarding how you may access and review all of the proxy materials on the Internet. The Notice also instructs you as to how you may authorize your proxy via the Internet or by telephone. If you would like to receive a paper or email copy of the Company’s proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials printed on the Notice.
Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement53


Table of Contents

Other Information

 Q Can I vote my shares by filling out and returning the Notice?
 A No. The Notice identifies the items to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, but you cannot vote by marking the Notice and returning it. The Notice provides instructions on how to authorize your proxy via the Internet or by telephone or how to vote at the Annual Meeting or to request a paper proxy card, which will contain instructions for authorizing a proxy by the Internet, by telephone or by returning a signed paper proxy card.
 Q Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?
 A Only common stockholders of record as of the close of business on the Record Date (March 26, 2018) are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
 Q How can I vote my shares?
 A You may vote online during the Annual Meeting prior to the closing of the polls at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NLY2018, or by proxy via Internet (www.proxyvote.com), telephone (1-800-690-6903), or by completing and returning your proxy card. The Company recommends that you vote by proxy even if you plan to virtually attend the Annual Meeting as you can always change your vote online at the meeting. You can authorize a proxy to vote via the Internet or by telephone at any time prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, May 22, 2018, the day before the meeting date.
 Q What quorum is required for the Annual Meeting?
 A A quorum will be present at the Annual Meeting if a majority of the votes entitled to be cast are present, in person or by proxy. On the Record Date there were 1,159,657,350 outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, each entitled to one vote per share. Abstentions and broker “non-votes” will be treated as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. If a quorum is not present at the Annual Meeting, the Company expects that the Annual Meeting will be adjourned to solicit additional proxies.
 Q What are the voting requirements that apply to the proposals discussed in this Proxy Statement?
 A ProposalVote
   Required   
Discretionary
   Voting Allowed?   
Board
   Recommendation   
(1)Election of Directors listed hereinMajorityNoFOR
(2)Advisory approval of executive compensationMajorityNoFOR
(3)Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young
for 2018
MajorityYesFOR
“Majority” means (a) with regard to an uncontested election of Directors, the affirmative vote of a majority of total votes cast for and against the election of each Director; and (b) with regard to the advisory approval of executive compensation and the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young, a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting.
“Discretionary voting” occurs when a bank, broker, or other holder of record does not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner and votes those shares in its discretion on any proposal as to which the rules of the NYSE permit such bank, broker, or other holder of record to vote (“routine matters”). When banks, brokers, and other holders of record are not permitted under the NYSE rules to vote the beneficial owner’s shares on a proposal (“non-routine matters”), if you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on such proposal. This is referred to as a broker “non-vote.”
For each of the proposals above, you can vote or authorize a proxy to vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.”
 Q What is the effect of abstentions and broker “non-votes” on the proposals submitted at the Annual Meeting?
 A Abstentions will have no effect on any of the proposals submitted at the Annual Meeting.
Broker “non-votes”, if any, will have no effect on Proposal 1 or Proposal 2, and are not applicable to Proposal 3.
54Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Other Information

 Q How will my shares be voted if I do not specify how they should be voted?
 A Properly executed proxies that do not contain voting instructions will be voted as follows:
(1)Proposal No. 1: FOR the election of each Director nominee listed herein;
(2)Proposal No. 2: FOR the approval, on a non-binding and advisory basis, of the Company’s executive compensation; and
(3)Proposal No. 3: FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.

The Company officers you authorize as proxies may exercise their proxy and vote your shares for one or more postponements or adjournments of the Annual Meeting, including postponements or adjournments to permit further solicitations of proxies.

 Q What do I do if I want to change my vote?
 A You may revoke a proxy at any time before it is exercised by filing a duly executed revocation of proxy, by submitting a duly executed proxy with a later date, using the phone or online voting procedures, or by participating in the Annual Meeting via live webcast and voting online during the Annual Meeting prior to the closing of the polls. You may revoke a proxy by any of these methods, regardless of the method used to deliver your previous proxy. Virtual attendance at the Annual Meeting without voting online will not itself revoke a proxy.
 Q How will voting on any other business be conducted?
 A Other than the three proposals described in this Proxy Statement, the Company knows of no other business to be considered at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly presented at the meeting, your signed proxy card authorizes Kevin G. Keyes, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Anthony C. Green, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, or either of them acting alone, to vote on those matters in their discretion.
 Q Who will count the vote?
 A Representatives of American Election Services, LLC, the independent inspector of elections, will count the votes.
 Q How can I participate in the Annual Meeting?
 A All stockholders of record as of the Record Date can attend the Annual Meeting online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NLY2018. An audio broadcast of the Annual Meeting will also be available to stockholders by telephone toll-free at 1-877-328-2502. Please note that listening to the audio broadcast will not be deemed to be attending the Annual Meeting, and you cannot vote from such audio broadcast. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting online or listen to the telephonic audio broadcast, you will need the 16-digit control number included in your Notice, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompany your proxy materials. Online check-in will begin at 8:30 a.m. (Eastern Time), and you should allow ample time for online check-in procedures. If you wish to watch the webcast at a location provided by the Company, the Company’s Maryland counsel, Venable LLP, will air the webcast at its offices located at 750 E. Pratt Street, Suite 900, Baltimore, MD 21202. Please note that no members of management or the Board will be in attendance at this location. If you wish to view the Annual Meeting via webcast at Venable LLP’s office, please complete theReservation Request Form found at the end of this Proxy Statement. In addition, you must bring a valid, government-issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license or a passport to Venable LLP’s offices.
 Q What is the pre-meeting forum and how can I access it?
 A One of the benefits of the online Annual Meeting format is that it allows the Company to communicate more effectively with its stockholders via a pre-meeting forum that you can access by visiting www.proxyvote.com. Through use of the pre-meeting forum, stockholders can submit questions in advance of the Annual Meeting and view copies of the Company’s proxy materials. The Company will respond to as many inquiries at the Annual Meeting as time allows.
Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement55


Table of Contents

Other Information

 Q Why is the Company holding the Annual Meeting online?
 A After years of declining attendance by stockholders at Annaly’s in-person annual meetings, the Company is moving to an online format for this year’s Annual Meeting to enable increased attendance and participation from locations around the world and reduce costs for both the Company and stockholders. This approach also aligns with the Company’s broader sustainability goals.
 Q What if I have difficulties accessing the pre-meeting forum or locating my 16-digit control number prior to the day of the Annual Meeting on May 23, 2018?
 A Prior to the day of the Annual Meeting on May 23, 2018, if you need assistance with your 16-digit control number and you hold your shares in your own name, please call toll-free 1-866-232-3037 in the United States or 1-720-358-3640 if calling from outside the United States If you hold your shares in the name of a bank or brokerage firm, you will need to contact your bank or brokerage firm for assistance with your 16-digit control number.
 Q What if during the check-in time or during the Annual Meeting I have technical difficulties or trouble accessing the live webcast of the Annual Meeting?
 A If you encounter any difficulties accessing the live webcast of the Annual Meeting during the check-in or during the Annual Meeting itself, including any difficulties with your 16-digit control number, please call toll-free 1-855-449-0991 in the United States or 1-720-378-5962 if calling from outside the United States, for assistance. Technicians will be ready to assist you beginning at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time with any difficulties.
 Q How will the Company solicit proxies for the Annual Meeting?
 A The expense of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. Proxies will be solicited principally through the use of mail, but Directors, executive officers and employees, who will not be specially compensated, may solicit proxies from stockholders by telephone, facsimile or other electronic means or in person. Also, the Company will reimburse banks, brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for any reasonable expenses in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners.

The Company has retained Georgeson Inc., a proxy solicitation firm, to assist it in the solicitation of proxies in connection with the Annual Meeting. The Company will pay Georgeson a fee of $15,000 for its services. In addition, the Company may pay Georgeson additional fees depending on the extent of additional services requested by the Company and will reimburse Georgeson for expenses Georgeson incurs in connection with its engagement by the Company. In addition to the fees paid to Georgeson, the Company will pay all other costs of soliciting proxies.

Stockholders have the option to vote over the Internet or by telephone. Please be aware that if you vote over the Internet, you may incur costs such as telephone and access charges for which you will be responsible.

 Q What is “Householding” and does Annaly do this?
 A “Householding” is a procedure approved by the SEC under which stockholders who have the same address and last name and do not participate in electronic delivery of proxy materials receive only one copy of a company’s Proxy Statement and Annual Report unless one or more of these stockholders notifies the company or their respective bank, broker or other intermediary that they wish to continue to receive individual copies. The Company engages in this practice as it reduces printing and postage costs. However, if a stockholder of record residing at such an address wishes to receive a separate Annual Report or Proxy Statement, he, she or it may request it by writing to Annaly Capital Management, Inc., 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036, Attention: Investor Relations, by emailing investor@annaly.com, or by calling 212-696-0100, and the Company will promptly deliver the requested Annual Report or Proxy Statement. If a stockholder of record residing at such an address wishes to receive a separate Annual Report or Proxy Statement in the future, he, she or it may contact the Company in the same manner. If you are an eligible stockholder of record receiving multiple copies of the Company’s Annual Report and Proxy Statement, you can request householding by contacting the Company in the same manner. If you own your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee, you can request householding by contacting the bank, broker or other nominee.
56Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Other Information

 Q Could the Annual Meeting be postponed or adjourned?
 A If a quorum is not present or represented, the Company’s Bylaws permit the chairman of the meeting to postpone or adjourn the Annual Meeting, without notice other than an announcement at the Annual Meeting.
 Q Who can help answer my questions?
 A If you have any questions or need assistance voting your shares or if you need copies of this Proxy Statement or the proxy card, you should contact:
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Phone: 1-888-8 ANNALY
Facsimile: (212) 696-9809
Email: investor@annaly.com
Attention: Investor Relations

The Company’s principal executive offices are located at the address above.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

The Company files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any reports, statements or other information that the Company files with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room at Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.

Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the Public Reference Room. These SEC filings are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and at the Internet worldwide web site maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov. Reports, proxy statements and other information concerning the Company may also be inspected at the offices of the NYSE, which is located at 20 Broad Street, New York, NY 10005.

Annaly’s website is www.annaly.com. The Company makes available on ourthis websitewww.annaly.com, under “Investor Relations/“Investors - SEC Filings,” free of charge, ourits annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after wesuch materials are electronically filefiled or furnish such materialsfurnished to the SEC.

Annaly Capital Management Inc. 2018 Proxy StatementSTOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS57


Any stockholder intendingTable of Contents

2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
RESERVATION REQUEST FORM

If you wish to present a proposal at our 2016view Annaly Capital Management, Inc.’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders webcast at the offices of Venable LLP (located at 750 E. Pratt Street, Suite 900, Baltimore, MD 21202), please complete the following information and have the proposal included in the proxy statement for such meeting must, in additionreturn to complying with the applicable lawsAnthony C. Green, Chief Legal Officer and regulations governing submissions of such proposals, submit the proposal in writing to us no later than December 12, 2015.

Pursuant to our current Bylaws, any stockholder intending to nominate a Director or present a proposal at an annual meeting of our stockholders, that is not intended to be included in the proxy statement for such annual meeting, must notify us in writing not less than 120 days nor more than 150 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting. Accordingly, any stockholder who intends to submit such a nomination or such a proposal at our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must notify us in writing of such proposal by December 12, 2015, but in no event earlier than November 12, 2015.

Any such nomination or proposal should be sent to Secretary, Annaly Capital Management, Inc., 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036 and, to the extent applicable, must include the information required by our Bylaws.

OTHER MATTERS

As10036. Please note that no members of the datemanagement or of this proxy statement, the Board of Directors does not know of any matter that will be presented for considerationpresent at the annual meeting other thanVenable LLP’s offices. In addition, you must bring a valid, government-issued photo identification, such as described in this proxy statement.a driver’s license or a passport to Venable LLP’s offices.



Table of Contents

ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.
1211 AVE. OF THE AMERICAS
NEW YORK, NY 10036
ATTN: GLENN A. VOTEK
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructionsYour name and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.address:
 
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALSNumber of Shares of NLY
Common Stock You Hold:
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
 
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmitIf the shares listed above are not registered in your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Timename, please identify the day beforename of the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand whenregistered stockholder belowand include evidence that you call and then followbeneficially own the instructions.shares.
 
VOTE BY MAILRegistered Stockholder:
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided(Name of Your Bank, Broker or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.Other Nominee)

THIS IS NOT A PROXY CARD






















































Table of Contents

ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.
1211 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS
NEW YORK, NY 10036
ATTN: GLENN A. VOTEK

VOTE BY INTERNET
Before The Meeting - Go to
www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

During The Meeting - Go towww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NLY2018

You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.







TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
E38745-P03314KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

                 
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:

 
1.   Election of Directors
Nominees:
  For  Against  Abstain
1a.   Wellington J. Denahan
   
1b.Michael Haylon
1c.Donnell A. Segalas
1d.Katie Beirne Fallon
1e.Vicki Williams




1a.   Wellington J. DenahanFor address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.
 

1b.   Michael Haylon
1c.   Donnell A. Segalas
   
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposal 2:
ForAgainstAbstain
2.     Advisory approval of the company's executive compensation.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 andproposal 3:ForAgainstAbstain

2.The proposal to approve a non-binding advisory resolution on executive compensation.
3.Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as ourthe company's independent registered public accounting firm for 2015.the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.

NOTE: SuchVoting items may include such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
YesNo
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting




Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.



Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date




Table of Contents

Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
1211 Avenue of the Americas,
New York, NY 10036






Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:The 2014 ANNUAL REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS, 2015 NOTICE & PROXY STATEMENT is/are available atwww.proxyvote.com.


Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
May 21, 2015
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors

Revoking all prior proxies, the undersigned hereby appoints Wellington J. Denahan and R. Nicholas Singh, and each of them, proxies, with full power of substitution, to appear on behalf1211 Avenue of the undersigned and to vote all sharesAmericas
New York, NY 10036




Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (the “Company”) that the undersigned is entitled to vote atProxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be heldMeeting:
The 2017 ANNUAL REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS and 2018 NOTICE & PROXY STATEMENT are available at the Warwick Hotel, 65 West 54th Street, New York, New York 10019, commencing at 9:00 a.m., New York time, on Thursday, May 21, 2015, and at any adjournment thereof, as fully and effectively as the undersigned could do if personally present and voting, hereby approving, ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys and agents or their substitutes may lawfully do in place of the undersigned as indicated below.www.proxyvote.com.






Continued and to be signed on reverse side



E38746-P03314

Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
May 23, 2018
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors

Revoking all prior proxies, the undersigned hereby appoints Kevin G. Keyes and Anthony C. Green, and each of them, proxies, with full power of substitution, to appear on behalf of the undersigned and to vote all shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (the "Company") that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, which will be a completely virtual meeting conducted via live webcast to be held at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NLY2018, and at any adjournment thereof as fully and effectively as the undersigned could do if personally present and voting, hereby approving, ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys and agents or their substitutes may lawfully do in place of the undersigned as indicated below.

The shares represented by this proxy when properly executed, will be voted as directed.If no directions are given, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors' recommendations as listed on the reverse side of this card and at their discretion on any other matter that may properly come before the meeting.


Address Changes/Comments: 

(If you noted any address change and/or comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

Continued and to be signed on reverse side